» Articles » PMID: 22582816

Choice Behavior of Pigeons (Columba Livia), College Students, and Preschool Children (Homo Sapiens) in the Monty Hall Dilemma

Overview
Journal J Comp Psychol
Date 2012 May 16
PMID 22582816
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the Monty Hall dilemma, an individual chooses between three options, only one of which will deliver a prize. After the initial choice, one of the nonchosen options is revealed as a losing option, and the individual can choose to stay with the original choice or switch to the other remaining option. Previous studies have found that most adults stay with their initial choice, although the chances of winning are 2/3 for switching and 1/3 for staying. Pigeons, college students, and preschool children were given many trials on this task to examine how their choices might change with experience. The college students began to switch on a majority of trials much sooner than the pigeons, contrary to the findings by Herbranson and Schroeder (2010) that pigeons perform better than people on this task. In all three groups, some individuals approximated the optimal strategy of switching on every trial, but most did not. Many of the preschoolers immediately showed a pattern of always switching or always staying and continued this pattern throughout the experiment. In a condition where the probability of winning was 90% after a switch, all college students and all but one pigeon learned to switch on nearly every trial. The results suggest that one main impediment to learning the optimal strategy in the Monty Hall task, even after repeated trials, is the difficulty in discriminating the different reinforcement probabilities for switching versus staying.

Citing Articles

Why Humans Fail in Solving the Monty Hall Dilemma: A Systematic Review.

Saenen L, Heyvaert M, Van Dooren W, Schaeken W, Onghena P Psychol Belg. 2018; 58(1):128-158.

PMID: 30479812 PMC: 6194549. DOI: 10.5334/pb.274.


Reasoning and choice in the Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD): implications for improving Bayesian reasoning.

Tubau E, Aguilar-Lleyda D, Johnson E Front Psychol. 2015; 6:353.

PMID: 25873906 PMC: 4379739. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00353.


The Monty Hall dilemma in pigeons: effect of investment in initial choice.

Stagner J, Rayburn-Reeves R, Zentall T Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 20(5):997-1004.

PMID: 23430792 PMC: 3873096. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0403-6.

References
1.
Teglas E, Girotto V, Gonzalez M, Bonatti L . Intuitions of probabilities shape expectations about the future at 12 months and beyond. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(48):19156-9. PMC: 2141924. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0700271104. View

2.
Schneider S, Lickliter R . Choice in quail neonates: the origins of generalized matching. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011; 94(3):315-26. PMC: 2972783. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-315. View

3.
Herbranson W, Schroeder J . Are birds smarter than mathematicians? Pigeons (Columba livia) perform optimally on a version of the Monty Hall Dilemma. J Comp Psychol. 2010; 124(1):1-13. PMC: 3086893. DOI: 10.1037/a0017703. View

4.
Wanchisen B, Tatham T, Hineline P . Human choice in "counterintuitive" situations: fixed- versus progressive-ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992; 58(1):67-85. PMC: 1322114. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-67. View

5.
Mazur J . Distributed versus exclusive preference in discrete-trial choice. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010; 36(3):321-33. PMC: 2911998. DOI: 10.1037/a0017588. View