» Articles » PMID: 22582102

Efficacy of Etoricoxib, Celecoxib, Lumiracoxib, Non-selective NSAIDs, and Acetaminophen in Osteoarthritis: a Mixed Treatment Comparison

Overview
Publisher Bentham Open
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2012 May 15
PMID 22582102
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of etoricoxib, lumiracoxib, celecoxib, non-selective (ns) NSAIDs and acetaminophen in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) METHODS: Randomized placebo controlled trials investigating the effects of acetaminophen 4000mg, diclofenac 150mg, naproxen 1000mg, ibuprofen 2400mg, celecoxib 100-400mg, lumiracoxib 100-400mg, and etoricoxib 30-60mg with treatment duration of at least two weeks were identified with a systematic literature search. The endpoints of interest were pain, physical function and patient global assessment of disease status (PGADS). Pain and physical function reported on different scales (VAS or LIKERT) were translated into effect sizes (ES). An ES 0.2 - 0.5 was defined as a "small" treatment effect, whereas ES of 0.5 - 0.8 and > 0.8 were defined as "moderate" and "large", respectively. A negative effect indicated superior effects of the treatment group compared to the control group. Results of all trials were analyzed simultaneously with a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison.

Results: There is a >95% probability that etoricoxib (30 or 60mg) shows the greatest improvement in pain and physical function of all interventions compared. ESs of etoricoxib 30mg relative to placebo, celecoxib 200mg, ibuprofen 2400mg, and diclofenac 150mg were -0.66 (95% Credible Interval -0.83; -0.49), -0.32 (-0.50; -0.14), -0.25 (-0.53; 0.03), and -0.17 (-0.41; 0.08), respectively. Regarding physical functioning, ESs of etoricoxib 30mg relative to placebo, celecoxib 200mg, ibuprofen 2400mg, and diclofenac 150mg were -0.61 (-0.76; -0.46), -0.27 (-0.43; -0.10), -0.20 (-0.47; 0.07), and -0.09 (- 0.33; 0.14) respectively. The greatest improvements in PGADS were expected with either etoricoxib or diclofenac.

Conclusion: The current study estimated the efficacy of acetaminophen, nsNSAIDs, and COX-2 selective NSAIDs in OA and found that etoricoxib 30 mg is likely to result in the greatest improvements in pain and physical function. Differences in PGADS between interventions were smaller.

Citing Articles

The comparative efficacy of L-glutamine, celecoxib, and glucosamine sulfate in osteoarthritis management.

Hu Z, Wang C, Wang C, He J, Yan Y, Xu Z Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8992.

PMID: 40089639 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93357-y.


Celecoxib and Etoricoxib may reduce risk of ischemic stroke in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Chen A, Lee Y, Perng W, Chiou J, Wang Y, Lin L Front Neurol. 2022; 13:1018521.

PMID: 36341096 PMC: 9630581. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1018521.


The Efficacy, Tolerability, and Joint Safety of Fasinumab in Osteoarthritis Pain: A Phase IIb/III Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Dakin P, DiMartino S, Gao H, Maloney J, Kivitz A, Schnitzer T Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71(11):1824-1834.

PMID: 31207169 PMC: 6900077. DOI: 10.1002/art.41012.


Dietary Ingredients Requiring Further Research Before Evidence-Based Recommendations Can Be Made for Their Use as an Approach to Mitigating Pain.

Crawford C, Boyd C, Berry K, Deuster P Pain Med. 2019; 20(8):1619-1632.

PMID: 30986310 PMC: 6686118. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz050.


Conditional Recommendations for Specific Dietary Ingredients as an Approach to Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Evidence-Based Decision Aid for Health Care Providers, Participants, and Policy Makers.

Boyd C, Crawford C, Berry K, Deuster P Pain Med. 2019; 20(7):1430-1448.

PMID: 30986301 PMC: 6611527. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz051.


References
1.
Callahan L . The burden of rheumatoid arthritis: facts and figures. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1998; 53:8-12. View

2.
Smugar S, Schnitzer T, Weaver A, Rubin B, Polis A, Tershakovec A . Rofecoxib 12.5 mg, rofecoxib 25 mg, and celecoxib 200 mg in the treatment of symptomatic osteoarthritis: results of two similarly designed studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006; 22(7):1353-67. DOI: 10.1185/030079906X104876. View

3.
Jansen J, Fleurence R, Devine B, Itzler R, Barrett A, Hawkins N . Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. Value Health. 2011; 14(4):417-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.002. View

4.
Schnitzer T, Weaver A, Polis A, Petruschke R, Geba G . Efficacy of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and acetaminophen in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. A combined analysis of the VACT studies. J Rheumatol. 2005; 32(6):1093-105. View

5.
Gibofsky A, Williams G, McKenna F, Fort J . Comparing the efficacy of cyclooxygenase 2-specific inhibitors in treating osteoarthritis: appropriate trial design considerations and results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003; 48(11):3102-11. DOI: 10.1002/art.11330. View