» Articles » PMID: 22561917

Sulfite Species Enhance Carbon Monoxide Release from CO-releasing Molecules: Implications for the Deoxymyoglobin Assay of Activity

Overview
Journal Anal Biochem
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2012 May 8
PMID 22561917
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Carbon monoxide-releasing molecules (CO-RMs) emulate the beneficial (e.g., anti-inflammatory) effects of CO in biology. CO release from CO-RMs is routinely determined in the presence of reduced deoxy-myoglobin by measuring the formation of carboxy-myoglobin (Mb-CO). Previous studies have highlighted discrepancies between the apparent CO release rates of some CO-RMs established using this assay versus other experimental data where a slower or more complex mechanism of release is suggested. It has been hypothesized that some CO-RMs require a CO acceptor, believed to be reduced myoglobin in Mb-CO assays, in order to facilitate the release of CO. Here, we show, for the first time, that CO is not liberated from the ruthenium (Ru)-based [Ru(CO)(3)Cl(2)](2) (CORM-2) and [Ru(CO)(3)Cl(glycinate)] (CORM-3) at an appreciable rate in the presence of reduced myoglobin alone. Rather, we confirm that it is the reducing agent sodium dithionite that facilitates release of CO from these CO-RMs. Other sulfite compounds, namely sodium sulfite and potassium metabisulfite, also promote the liberation of CO from CORM-3. We describe an alternative oxy-hemoglobin assay that eliminates dithionite and suggest that the efficacy of CO-RMs results from intracellular interactions with anions that facilitate CO delivery to therapeutic targets.

Citing Articles

A Tale of Two Cities in Fluorescent Sensing of Carbon Monoxide: Probes That Detect CO and Those That Detect Only Chemically Reactive CO Donors (CORMs), but Not CO.

Liu D, Yang X, Wang B J Org Chem. 2024; 89(24):17891-17909.

PMID: 39540647 PMC: 11667734. DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.4c02301.


Carbon Monoxide Release from Aryl-Propargyl Dicobalt(0)Hexacarbonyl Derivatives: A Computational and Experimental Study.

Paciotti R, Coletti C, Berrino E, Arrighi F, Maccelli A, Lasalvia A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(21).

PMID: 39519196 PMC: 11546923. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252111644.


On the Question of Uncatalyzed CO Insertion into a Hydrazone Double Bond: A Comparative Study Using Different CO Sources and Substrates.

Liu D, Bauer N, Lu W, Yang X, Wang B J Org Chem. 2024; 89(13):9551-9556.

PMID: 38888488 PMC: 11232009. DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.4c00936.


On the Question of CO's Ability to Induce HO-1 Expression in Cell Culture: A Comparative Study Using Different CO Sources.

Yang X, Mao Q, Wang B ACS Chem Biol. 2024; 19(3):725-735.

PMID: 38340055 PMC: 10949199. DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.3c00750.


Plight of CORMs: The unreliability of four commercially available CO-releasing molecules, CORM-2, CORM-3, CORM-A1, and CORM-401, in studying CO biology.

Bauer N, Yuan Z, Yang X, Wang B Biochem Pharmacol. 2023; 214:115642.

PMID: 37321416 PMC: 10529722. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2023.115642.