» Articles » PMID: 22554791

Differences in the Ability of Spermatozoa from Individual Boar Ejaculates to Withstand Different Semen-processing Techniques

Overview
Journal Anim Reprod Sci
Date 2012 May 5
PMID 22554791
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the ability of spermatozoa from individual boar ejaculates to withstand different semen-processing techniques. Eighteen sperm-rich ejaculate samples from six boars (three per boar) were diluted in Beltsville Thawing Solution and split into three aliquots. The aliquots were (1) further diluted to 3×10(7) sperm/mL and stored as a liquid at 17°C for 72 h, (2) frozen-thawed (FT) at 1×10(9) sperm/mL using standard 0.5-mL straw protocols, or (3) sex-sorted with subsequent liquid storage (at 17°C for 6 h) or FT (2×10(7) sperm/mL using a standard 0.25-mL straw protocol). The sperm quality was evaluated based on total sperm motility (the CASA system), viability (plasma membrane integrity assessed using flow cytometry and the LIVE/DEAD Sperm Viability Kit), lipid peroxidation (assessed via indirect measurement of the generation of malondialdehyde (MDA) using the BIOXYTECH MDA-586 Assay Kit) and DNA fragmentation (sperm chromatin dispersion assessed using the Sperm-Sus-Halomax(®) test). Data were normalized to the values assessed for the fresh (for liquid-stored and FT samples) or the sorted semen samples (for liquid stored and the FT sorted spermatozoa). All of the four sperm-processing techniques affected sperm quality (P<0.01), regardless of the semen donor, with reduced percentages of motile and viable sperm and increased MDA generation and percentages of sperm with fragmented DNA. Significant (P<0.05) inter-boar (effect of boars within each semen-processing technique) and intra-boar (effect of semen-processing techniques within each boar) differences were evident for all of the sperm quality parameters assessed, indicating differences in the ability of spermatozoa from individual boars to withstand the semen-processing techniques. These results are the first evidence that ejaculate spermatozoa from individual boars can respond in a boar-dependent manner to different semen-processing techniques.

Citing Articles

Boar Sperm Motility Assessment Using Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis: Current Practices, Limitations, and Methodological Challenges.

Hackerova L, Pilsova A, Pilsova Z, Zelenkova N, Tymich Hegrova P, Klusackova B Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39943075 PMC: 11816302. DOI: 10.3390/ani15030305.


Boar-to-Boar Variations in Quality Characteristics of Sperm from Different Ejaculates Following Freezing-Thawing.

Fraser L, Zasiadczyk L, Mogielnicka-Brzozowska M Cells. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39937003 PMC: 11817640. DOI: 10.3390/cells14030212.


Characterization of Extracellular Vesicle-Coupled miRNA Profiles in Seminal Plasma of Boars with Divergent Semen Quality Status.

Dlamini N, Nguyen T, Gad A, Tesfaye D, Liao S, Willard S Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(4).

PMID: 36834606 PMC: 9961432. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24043194.


Compensability of Enhanced Cytoplasmic Droplet Rates in Boar Semen: Insights of a Retrospective Field Study.

Schulze M, Waberski D Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(20).

PMID: 36290278 PMC: 9598426. DOI: 10.3390/ani12202892.


Oxytocin in pig seminal plasma is positively related with in vivo fertility of inseminated sows.

Padilla L, Lopez-Arjona M, Martinez-Subiela S, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Roca J, Barranco I J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2021; 12(1):101.

PMID: 34511116 PMC: 8436503. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-021-00620-z.