» Articles » PMID: 22553740

Epidemiology, Genetics and Treatments for Myopia

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2012 May 4
PMID 22553740
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Myopia is a significant public health problem and its prevalence is increasing over time and genetic factors in disease development are important. The prevalence and incidence of myopia within sampled population often varies with age, country, sex, race, ethnicity, occupation, environment, and other factors. Myopia growth is under a combination of genes and their products in time and space to complete the coordination role of the guidance. Myopia-related genes include about 70 genetic loci to which primary myopias have been mapped, although the number is constantly increasing and depends to some extent on definition. Of these, several are associated with additional abnormalities, mostly as part of developmental syndromes. These tend to result from mutations in genes encoding transcriptional activators, and most of these have been identified by sequencing candidate genes in patients with developmental anomalies. Currently, COL1A1 (collagen alpha-1 chain of type I), COL2A1 (collagen alpha-1 chain of type II), ACTC1 (actin, alpha, cardiac muscle 1), PAX6 (paired box gene 6) and NIPBL (nipped-B homolog), and so on have been mapped. Myopia is most commonly treated with spectacles or glasses. The most common surgical procedure performed to correct myopia is laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). This review of the recent advances on epidemiology, genetic locations and treatments of myopia are summarized.

Citing Articles

New Frontiers in Myopia Progression in Children.

Queiros A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685771 PMC: 11642422. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237314.


Prevalence of Myopia Among Schoolchildren and the Impact of Increased Screen Time: A Systematic Review.

Khalaf A, Alhazimi A, Almaymuni K, Alsubaie N Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e66815.

PMID: 39280371 PMC: 11393148. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66815.


The Relationship between Myopia and Obesity in Adults.

Noh Y, Jung K Korean J Ophthalmol. 2024; 38(2):137-146.

PMID: 38449306 PMC: 11016688. DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2023.0102.


The Relationship Between Decrease in Vision Aquity and Gadget Use During Online Lectures and COVID-19 Pandemic in Students of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Savira M, Al Ghifari M Acta Inform Med. 2024; 31(4):240-243.

PMID: 38379695 PMC: 10875933. DOI: 10.5455/aim.2023.31.240-243.


Effect of auricular acupressure combined with acupuncture for juvenile pseudomyopia.

Zhu Y, Chen Y, Zou T, Cao P Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(37):e35018.

PMID: 37713874 PMC: 10508539. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035018.


References
1.
Jugessur A, Shi M, Gjessing H, Lie R, Wilcox A, Weinberg C . Maternal genes and facial clefts in offspring: a comprehensive search for genetic associations in two population-based cleft studies from Scandinavia. PLoS One. 2010; 5(7):e11493. PMC: 2901336. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011493. View

2.
Logan N, Davies L, Mallen E, Gilmartin B . Ametropia and ocular biometry in a U.K. university student population. Optom Vis Sci. 2005; 82(4):261-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000159358.71125.95. View

3.
. Progressive-addition lenses versus single-vision lenses for slowing progression of myopia in children with high accommodative lag and near esophoria. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52(5):2749-57. PMC: 3088561. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6631. View

4.
Muallem M, Nelson G, Osmanovic S, Quinones R, Viana M, Edward D . Predicted refraction versus refraction outcome in cataract surgery after trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma. 2009; 18(4):284-7. PMC: 2729937. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318184567b. View

5.
Dalcoll M, Alves M, Barreto Jr J, Yamane I, Bechara S, Mukai A . [Evaluation of optical performance of soft contact lenses in myopic correction]. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009; 71(6 Suppl):37-41. DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492008000700008. View