» Articles » PMID: 22552789

Prospective Study of Postoperative Sensory Disturbances After Surgical Treatment of Mandibular Fractures

Overview
Date 2012 May 4
PMID 22552789
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: This present study's purpose is to evaluate the degree of paresthesia and recovery of inferior alveolar nerve in patients with mandible fractures who underwent surgical treatment.

Material And Methods: Nineteen patients were evaluated (27 hemimandibles) at six different times: preoperative (T1), postoperative 1 week (T2), postoperative 1 month (T3), postoperative 3 months (T4), postoperative 6 months (T5), and postoperative 1 year (T6). Subjective and objective methods were used for this evaluation.

Results: The results were analyzed using likelihood ratio chi-square test for the hypothesis of no association between indicators of sensitivity and responses to the questionnaire, and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for equality hypothesis. All objective tests showed a statistically significant worsening in sensitivity at T2 (p < 0.0001) and a significant improvement after T4 (α < 0.05). The subjective tests showed an association with the objectives tests, and improvement in sensitivity after T4 (p < 0.0001) was noted.

Discussion: The first postoperative week is the period in which there are major changes with respect to sensitivity, and after 3 months postoperatively, the recovery reaches its apex with little difference observed after this period. In this research 100 % of the patients analyzed recovered all sensibility until T6.

Citing Articles

Effects of light-emitting diode (LED) therapy on sensory changes in the inferior alveolar nerve after surgical treatment of mandibular fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Assis Santos V, Rocha-Junior W, Luz J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 28(1):185-193.

PMID: 36348150 DOI: 10.1007/s10006-022-01127-1.


Inferior alveolar nerve dysfunction in mandibular fractures: a prospective cohort study.

S N C, Shetty S, Shetty S, Shah A J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 47(3):183-189.

PMID: 34187958 PMC: 8249188. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.3.183.

References
1.
Ghali G, EPKER B . Clinical neurosensory testing: practical applications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989; 47(10):1074-8. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(89)90184-5. View

2.
Tay A, Zuniga J . Clinical characteristics of trigeminal nerve injury referrals to a university centre. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36(10):922-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.03.012. View

3.
Iizuka T, Lindqvist C . Sensory disturbances associated with rigid internal fixation of mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991; 49(12):1264-8. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90301-2. View

4.
Poort L, van Neck J, van der Wal K . Sensory testing of inferior alveolar nerve injuries: a review of methods used in prospective studies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67(2):292-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.076. View

5.
Renzi G, Carboni A, Perugini M, Giovannetti F, Becelli R . Posttraumatic trigeminal nerve impairment: a prospective analysis of recovery patterns in a series of 103 consecutive facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62(11):1341-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.212. View