» Articles » PMID: 22551393

A Method of Moments Estimator for Random Effect Multivariate Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Biometrics
Specialty Public Health
Date 2012 May 4
PMID 22551393
Citations 79
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Meta-analysis is a powerful approach to combine evidence from multiple studies to make inference about one or more parameters of interest, such as regression coefficients. The validity of the fixed effect model meta-analysis depends on the underlying assumption that all studies in the meta-analysis share the same effect size. In the presence of heterogeneity, the fixed effect model incorrectly ignores the between-study variance and may yield false positive results. The random effect model takes into account both within-study and between-study variances. It is more conservative than the fixed effect model and should be favored in the presence of heterogeneity. In this paper, we develop a noniterative method of moments estimator for the between-study covariance matrix in the random effect model multivariate meta-analysis. To our knowledge, it is the first such method of moments estimator in the matrix form. We show that our estimator is a multivariate extension of DerSimonian and Laird's univariate method of moments estimator, and it is invariant to linear transformations. In the simulation study, our method performs well when compared to existing random effect model multivariate meta-analysis approaches. We also apply our method in the analysis of a real data example.

Citing Articles

The effectiveness of psychological interventions on diabetes distress and glycemic level in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zu W, Zhang S, Du L, Huang X, Nie W, Wang L BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):660.

PMID: 39379853 PMC: 11462667. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06125-z.


Comparison of the efficacy of parent-mediated NDBIs on developmental skills in children with ASD and fidelity in parents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Ouyang Y, Feng J, Wang T, Xue Y, Mohamed Z, Jia F BMC Pediatr. 2024; 24(1):270.

PMID: 38664754 PMC: 11044316. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-04752-9.


Computing within-study covariances, data visualization, and missing data solutions for multivariate meta-analysis with metavcov.

Lu M Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1185012.

PMID: 37408962 PMC: 10319001. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185012.


Web-Based Interventions for Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Guo P, Chen D, Xu P, Wang X, Zhang W, Mao M J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e36922.

PMID: 36656629 PMC: 9896357. DOI: 10.2196/36922.


Web-based interventions for pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Guo P, Jin Y, Xiang Z, Chen D, Xu P, Wang X BMJ Open. 2022; 12(6):e061151.

PMID: 35768118 PMC: 9244690. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061151.


References
1.
DerSimonian R, Laird N . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7(3):177-88. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. View

2.
Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

3.
Follmann D, Proschan M . Valid inference in random effects meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2001; 55(3):732-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00732.x. View

4.
Berkey C, Hoaglin D, Mosteller F, Colditz G . Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes by regression with random effects. Stat Med. 1998; 17(22):2537-50. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981130)17:22<2537::aid-sim953>3.0.co;2-c. View

5.
Ma Y, Mazumdar M . Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic. Stat Med. 2011; 30(24):2911-29. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4327. View