» Articles » PMID: 22547962

Comparison Between Manual and Semiautomated Volumetric Measurements of Pituitary Adenomas

Overview
Journal Skull Base
Date 2012 May 2
PMID 22547962
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Linear measurements have many limitations. The aim of this study is to compare manual and semiautomated volumetric measurements of pituitary adenomas. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 38 patients with pituitary adenomas were analyzed. Preoperative MRI was acquired on a 1.5 T. MRI volumes of the pituitary adenomas were obtained by two methods: manual (MA) and semiautomated (SA). The concurrent validity for SA and MA methods on 38 patients in the form of correlation coefficient was 0.97 (p < 0.0001). The intraobserver and the interobserver correlation coefficients for SA volumes were both 0.98, as for the intraobserver MA volumes were 0.98. Although the results of both methods are comparable, analysis of volumetric measurements by SA method is more time-efficient than MA segmentation. Precision in volumetric measurement techniques is likely to increase reliability of posttherapeutic monitoring of pituitary adenomas.

Citing Articles

Comparing MRI volume measurement techniques for pituitary macroadenoma: Investigating volume reduction and its relationship with biochemical control.

Hussein I, Mansour A, Jameel N J Med Life. 2023; 16(7):998-1006.

PMID: 37900080 PMC: 10600678. DOI: 10.25122/jml-2022-0196.


Measuring pituitary tumor volume: a comparison of the simplified and non-simplified ellipsoid equation with the 3D planimetric volume assessment.

de Figueiredo R, de Souza Junior J, Triarca P, Beer-Furlan A, Melo N, Fernandes de Oliveira Santos B Pituitary. 2023; 26(4):383-392.

PMID: 37115292 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-023-01317-4.


Baseline MRI findings as predictors of hypopituitarism in patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas.

Al Argan R, Ramadhan A, Agnihotram R, Chankowsky J, Rivera J Endocr Connect. 2021; 10(11):1445-1454.

PMID: 34636742 PMC: 8630757. DOI: 10.1530/EC-21-0386.


Assessing size of pituitary adenomas: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative methods on MR.

Davies B, Carr E, Soh C, Gnanalingham K Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016; 158(4):677-683.

PMID: 26821836 PMC: 4791475. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-015-2699-7.

References
1.
Marziali S, Gaudiello F, Bozzao A, Scire G, Ferone E, Colangelo V . Evaluation of anterior pituitary gland volume in childhood using three-dimensional MRI. Pediatr Radiol. 2004; 34(7):547-51. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-004-1208-6. View

2.
Buhk J, Jung S, Nikos Psychogios M, Goricke S, Hartz S, Schulz-Heise S . Tumor volume of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas during treatment with pegvisomant: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 95(2):552-8. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2009-1239. View

3.
Fink A, Vidmar S, Kumbla S, Pedreira C, Kanumakala S, Williams C . Age-related pituitary volumes in prepubertal children with normal endocrine function: volumetric magnetic resonance data. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 90(6):3274-8. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2004-1558. View

4.
Wowra B, Stummer W . Efficacy of gamma knife radiosurgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a quantitative follow up with magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetric analysis. J Neurosurg. 2003; 97(5 Suppl):429-32. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.supplement. View

5.
Yushkevich P, Piven J, Hazlett H, Smith R, Ho S, Gee J . User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage. 2006; 31(3):1116-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015. View