» Articles » PMID: 22547443

Meta-analysis of Dose-response Relationships for Hydrochlorothiazide, Chlorthalidone, and Bendroflumethiazide on Blood Pressure, Serum Potassium, and Urate

Overview
Journal Hypertension
Date 2012 May 2
PMID 22547443
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics are widely used in the management of hypertension, but recently the equivalence of hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone for blood pressure (BP) lowering and prevention of cardiovascular disease has been questioned. We performed a meta-analysis to characterize the dose-response relationships for 3 commonly prescribed thiazide diuretics, hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, and bendroflumethiazide, on BP, serum potassium, and urate. Randomized, double-blind, parallel placebo-controlled trials meeting the following criteria, ≥ 2 different monotherapy dose arms, follow-up duration ≥ 4 weeks, and baseline washout of medication ≥ 2 weeks, were identified using Embase (1980-2010 week 50), Medline (1950-2010 November week 3), metaRegister of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Central. A total of 26 trials examined hydrochlorothiazide, 3 examined chlorthalidone, and 1 examined bendroflumethiazide. Studies included a total of 4683 subjects in >53 comparison arms. Meta-regression of the effect of thiazides on systolic BP showed a log-linear relationship with a potency series: bendroflumethiazide>chlorthalidone>hydrochlorothiazide. The estimated dose of each drug predicted to reduce systolic BP by 10 mm Hg was 1.4, 8.6, and 26.4 mg, respectively, and there was no evidence of a difference in maximum reduction of systolic BP by high doses of different thiazides. Potency series for diastolic BP, serum potassium, and urate were similar to those seen for systolic BP. Hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, and bendroflumethiazide have markedly different potency. This may account for differences in the antihypertensive effect between hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone using standard dose ranges.

Citing Articles

Thiazides for kidney stone recurrence prevention.

Bargagli M, Trelle S, Bonny O, Fuster D Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2024; 33(4):427-432.

PMID: 38606682 PMC: 11139243. DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000990.


[Are thiazide diuretics ineffective with a glomerular filtration rate lower than 50 ml/min?].

Hausberg M Inn Med (Heidelb). 2023; 65(2):180-184.

PMID: 38112725 DOI: 10.1007/s00108-023-01617-8.


Prevalence and associated factors of hyperuricemia among Chinese patients with diabetes: a cross-sectional study.

Sun S, Chen L, Chen D, Li Y, Liu G, Ma L Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2023; 14:20420188231198620.

PMID: 37719790 PMC: 10501065. DOI: 10.1177/20420188231198620.


Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Chlorthalidone and Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.

Khenhrani R, Nnodebe I, Rawat A, Adwani R, Ghaffar A, Devi S Cureus. 2023; 15(4):e38184.

PMID: 37252566 PMC: 10220471. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38184.


Should we CLICK on chlorthalidone for treatment-resistant hypertension in chronic kidney disease?.

Agarwal R Clin Kidney J. 2023; 16(5):793-796.

PMID: 37151421 PMC: 10157782. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac272.


References
1.
Kurtz T . Chlorthalidone: don't call it "thiazide-like" anymore. Hypertension. 2010; 56(3):335-7. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.156166. View

2.
Dorsch M, Gillespie B, Erickson S, Bleske B, Weder A . Chlorthalidone reduces cardiovascular events compared with hydrochlorothiazide: a retrospective cohort analysis. Hypertension. 2011; 57(4):689-94. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.161505. View

3.
Chobanian A, Bakris G, Black H, Cushman W, Green L, Izzo Jr J . Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003; 42(6):1206-52. DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2. View

4.
Messerli F, Bangalore S . Antihypertensive efficacy of aliskiren: is hydrochlorothiazide an appropriate benchmark?. Circulation. 2009; 119(3):371-3. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.828897. View

5.
Verdecchia P, Reboldi G, Angeli F, Borgioni C, Gattobigio R, Filippucci L . Adverse prognostic significance of new diabetes in treated hypertensive subjects. Hypertension. 2004; 43(5):963-9. DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000125726.92964.ab. View