» Articles » PMID: 22541508

Increasing Readiness to Decide and Strengthening Behavioral Intentions: Evaluating the Impact of a Web-based Patient Decision Aid for Breast Cancer Treatment Options (BresDex: Www.bresdex.com)

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Health Services
Nursing
Date 2012 May 1
PMID 22541508
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To undertake a quantitative evaluation of a theory-based, interactive online decision aid (BresDex) to support women choosing surgery for early breast cancer (Stage I and II), based on observations of its use in practice.

Methods: Observational cohort study. Website log-files collected data on the use of BresDex. Online questionnaires assessed knowledge about breast cancer and treatment options, degree to which women were deliberating about their options, and surgery intentions, pre- and post-BresDex.

Results: Readiness to make a decision significantly increased after using BresDex (p<.001), although there was no significant improvement in knowledge. Participants that were 'less ready' to make a decision before using BresDex, spent a longer time using BresDex (p<.05). Significant associations between surgery intentions and choices were observed (p<.001), with the majority of participants going on to have BCS. Greater length of time spent on BresDex was associated with stronger intentions to have BCS (p<.05).

Conclusion: The use of BresDex appears to facilitate readiness to make a decision for surgery, helping to strengthen surgery intentions.

Practice Implications: BresDex may prove a useful adjunct to the support provided by the clinical team for women facing surgery for early breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Factors Associated With Digital Intervention Engagement and Adherence in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review.

Montalescot L, Baussard L, Charbonnier E J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e52542.

PMID: 39661976 PMC: 11669875. DOI: 10.2196/52542.


Patient-provider communication while using a clinical decision support tool: explaining satisfaction with shared decision making for mammography screening.

Liu Y, Kornfield R, Yang E, Burnside E, Keevil J, Shah D BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022; 22(1):323.

PMID: 36476612 PMC: 9730626. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-02058-3.


A scoping review of interactive and personalized web-based clinical tools to support treatment decision making in breast cancer.

Zhao A, Larbi M, Miller K, ONeill S, Jayasekera J Breast. 2021; 61:43-57.

PMID: 34896693 PMC: 8669108. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.12.003.


Adequacy of measures of informed consent in medical practice: A systematic review.

Sherman K, Kilby C, Pehlivan M, Smith B PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0251485.

PMID: 34043651 PMC: 8159027. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251485.


Implementing a breast cancer patient decision aid: Process evaluation using medical files and the patients' perspective.

Savelberg W, Boersma L, Smidt M, van der Weijden T Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2020; 30(4):e13387.

PMID: 33314448 PMC: 8365645. DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13387.