» Articles » PMID: 22537763

The Relation of Urinary Estrogen Metabolites with Mammographic Densities in Premenopausal Women

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Oncology
Public Health
Date 2012 Apr 28
PMID 22537763
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mammographic density is a strong predictor of breast cancer risk. The total amount and the metabolism of endogenous estrogens, e.g., the ratio of 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE(1)) and 16α-OHE(1) may influence breast cancer risk. This study examined the association of urinary estrogen metabolites with breast density in premenopausal women.

Methods: Urine samples were collected at baseline and after 2 years, analyzed for 11 estrogen metabolites plus progesterone and testosterone by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, and adjusted for creatinine levels. Mixed-effects regression was applied to examine the association of estrogens with breast density.

Results: Total estrogen metabolites (181 ± 113 vs. 247 ± 165 pmol/mg creatinine, p=0.01) and the 2/16α-OH ratio (8.4 ± 10.4 vs. 13.0 ± 17.1, p=0.02) were lower in the 74 Asian than in the 114 non-Asian women. In adjusted models, positive associations of total estrogen metabolites (p=0.002) and the 2/16α-OHE(1) ratio (p=0.08) with percent density were detected in Asians only. In all women, mammographic density was positively associated with the 2-OH pathway (p=0.01), inversely related to the 16α-OH pathway (p=0.01), and not associated with the 4-OH pathway, testosterone, and progesterone. Results for the size of the dense area weakly reflected the findings for percent density, while associations with the non-dense area were in the opposite direction.

Conclusions: The findings that the 2-OH pathway is associated with higher and the 16α-OH pathway with lower breast density contradicts the hypothesized risk profile of these metabolites, but, if a relation between estrogen metabolites and breast cancer risk exists, it may be mediated through pathways other than mammographic density.

Citing Articles

CYP3A7*1C allele is associated with reduced levels of 2-hydroxylation pathway oestrogen metabolites.

Sood D, Johnson N, Jain P, Siskos A, Bennett M, Gilham C Br J Cancer. 2017; 116(3):382-388.

PMID: 28072767 PMC: 5294487. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.432.


Relationship of serum estrogens and metabolites with area and volume mammographic densities.

Gierach G, Patel D, Falk R, Pfeiffer R, Geller B, Vacek P Horm Cancer. 2015; 6(2-3):107-19.

PMID: 25757805 PMC: 4558904. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-015-0216-3.


Cyclic endogenous estrogen and progesterone vary by mammographic density phenotypes in premenopausal women.

Iversen A, Frydenberg H, Furberg A, Flote V, Finstad S, McTiernan A Eur J Cancer Prev. 2015; 25(1):9-18.

PMID: 25714648 PMC: 4885541. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000130.


Urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites and mammographic density in premenopausal women.

Bertrand K, Eliassen A, Hankinson S, Gierach G, Xu X, Rosner B Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 136(1):277-87.

PMID: 23053640 PMC: 3475411. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2240-0.

References
1.
Martin L, Minkin S, Boyd N . Hormone therapy, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk. Maturitas. 2009; 64(1):20-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.07.009. View

2.
Pettersson A, Hankinson S, Willett W, Lagiou P, Trichopoulos D, Tamimi R . Nondense mammographic area and risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2011; 13(5):R100. PMC: 3262213. DOI: 10.1186/bcr3041. View

3.
Shimizu H, Ross R, Bernstein L, Pike M, Henderson B . Serum oestrogen levels in postmenopausal women: comparison of American whites and Japanese in Japan. Br J Cancer. 1990; 62(3):451-3. PMC: 1971457. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1990.316. View

4.
Ursin G, Ma H, Wu A, Bernstein L, Salane M, Parisky Y . Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003; 12(4):332-8. View

5.
Riza E, dos Santos Silva I, De Stavola B, Bradlow H, Sepkovic D, Linos D . Urinary estrogen metabolites and mammographic parenchymal patterns in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001; 10(6):627-34. View