» Articles » PMID: 22536963

Identification of Binding Pockets in Protein Structures Using a Knowledge-based Potential Derived from Local Structural Similarities

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2012 Apr 28
PMID 22536963
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The identification of ligand binding sites is a key task in the annotation of proteins with known structure but uncharacterized function. Here we describe a knowledge-based method exploiting the observation that unrelated binding sites share small structural motifs that bind the same chemical fragments irrespective of the nature of the ligand as a whole.

Results: PDBinder compares a query protein against a library of binding and non-binding protein surface regions derived from the PDB. The results of the comparison are used to derive a propensity value for each residue which is correlated with the likelihood that the residue is part of a ligand binding site. The method was applied to two different problems: i) the prediction of ligand binding residues and ii) the identification of which surface cleft harbours the binding site. In both cases PDBinder performed consistently better than existing methods. PDBinder has been trained on a non-redundant set of 1356 high-quality protein-ligand complexes and tested on a set of 239 holo and apo complex pairs. We obtained an MCC of 0.313 on the holo set with a PPV of 0.413 while on the apo set we achieved an MCC of 0.271 and a PPV of 0.372.

Conclusions: We show that PDBinder performs better than existing methods. The good performance on the unbound proteins is extremely important for real-world applications where the location of the binding site is unknown. Moreover, since our approach is orthogonal to those used in other programs, the PDBinder propensity value can be integrated in other algorithms further increasing the final performance.

Citing Articles

and Assessment of Dimeric Flavonoids (Brachydins) on Glutathione S-transferase.

Dos Santos Bezerra W, Tavares C, Lima V, Rocha C, Vaz Junior I, Michels P Med Chem. 2024; 20(9):912-919.

PMID: 38847259 DOI: 10.2174/0115734064298481240517072216.


Predicting Anticancer Drug Resistance Mediated by Mutations.

Lin Y, Liu J, Chang Y, Yu C, Yi W, Lane H Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022; 15(2).

PMID: 35215249 PMC: 8878306. DOI: 10.3390/ph15020136.


Identification of native protein structures captured by principal interactions.

Mirzaie M BMC Bioinformatics. 2019; 20(1):604.

PMID: 31752663 PMC: 6873546. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-3186-6.


Predicting protein-ligand interactions based on bow-pharmacological space and Bayesian additive regression trees.

Li L, Koh C, Reker D, Brown J, Wang H, Lee N Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):7703.

PMID: 31118426 PMC: 6531441. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43125-6.


Identification and analysis of conserved pockets on protein surfaces.

Cammisa M, Correra A, Andreotti G, Cubellis M BMC Bioinformatics. 2013; 14 Suppl 7:S9.

PMID: 23815589 PMC: 3633052. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-S7-S9.


References
1.
Wass M, Kelley L, Sternberg M . 3DLigandSite: predicting ligand-binding sites using similar structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38(Web Server issue):W469-73. PMC: 2896164. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq406. View

2.
Henrick K, Thornton J . PQS: a protein quaternary structure file server. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998; 23(9):358-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01253-5. View

3.
Peters K, Fauck J, Frommel C . The automatic search for ligand binding sites in proteins of known three-dimensional structure using only geometric criteria. J Mol Biol. 1996; 256(1):201-13. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0077. View

4.
Amitai G, Shemesh A, Sitbon E, Shklar M, Netanely D, Venger I . Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues. J Mol Biol. 2004; 344(4):1135-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.055. View

5.
Gold N, Jackson R . Fold independent structural comparisons of protein-ligand binding sites for exploring functional relationships. J Mol Biol. 2005; 355(5):1112-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.11.044. View