» Articles » PMID: 22535979

Biochemical, Serological, and Virulence Characterization of Clinical and Oyster Vibrio Parahaemolyticus Isolates

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2012 Apr 27
PMID 22535979
Citations 71
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study, 77 clinical and 67 oyster Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates from North America were examined for biochemical profiles, serotype, and the presence of potential virulence factors (tdh, trh, and type III secretion system [T3SS] genes). All isolates were positive for oxidase, indole, and glucose fermentation, consistent with previous reports. The isolates represented 35 different serotypes, 9 of which were shared by clinical and oyster isolates. Serotypes associated with pandemic strains (O1:KUT, O1:K25, O3:K6, and O4:K68) were observed for clinical isolates, and 7 (9%) oyster isolates belonged to serotype O1:KUT. Of the clinical isolates, 27% were negative for tdh and trh, while 45% contained both genes. Oyster isolates were preferentially selected for the presence of tdh and/or trh; 34% contained both genes, 42% had trh but not tdh, and 3% had tdh but not trh. All but 1 isolate (143/144) had at least three of the four T3SS1 genes examined. The isolates lacking both tdh and trh contained no T3SS2α or T3SS2β genes. All clinical isolates positive for tdh and negative for trh possessed all T3SS2α genes, and all isolates negative for tdh and positive for trh possessed all T3SS2β genes. The two oyster isolates containing tdh but not trh possessed all but the vopB2 gene of T3SS2α, as reported previously. In contrast to the findings of previous studies, all strains examined that were positive for both tdh and trh also carried T3SS2β genes. This report identifies the serotype as the most distinguishing feature between clinical and oyster isolates. Our findings raise concerns about the reliability of the tdh, trh, and T3SS genes as virulence markers and highlight the need for more-detailed pathogenicity investigations of V. parahaemolyticus.

Citing Articles

Anti- Mechanism of Hexanal and Its Inhibitory Effect on Biofilm Formation.

Fan Q, Ning M, Zeng X, He X, Bai Z, Gu S Foods. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40002146 PMC: 11854835. DOI: 10.3390/foods14040703.


Genomic Insights into from Southern Korea: Pathogenicity, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Phylogenetic Distinctions.

Zin H, Lim J, Shin Y, Kim B, Yoon M, Ha K Microorganisms. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39770700 PMC: 11727765. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12122497.


Antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors and phylogenetic profiles of in the eastern coast of Shenzhen.

Lian X, Liu G, Huang M, Fan Q, Lin Z Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1452942.

PMID: 39588110 PMC: 11586387. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1452942.


Public health aspects of spp. related to the consumption of seafood in the EU.

Koutsoumanis K, Allende A, Alvarez-Ordonez A, Bolton D, Bover-Cid S, Chemaly M EFSA J. 2024; 22(7):e8896.

PMID: 39045511 PMC: 11263920. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8896.


Comparative Genomic Analysis of Shrimp-Pathogenic LC and Intraspecific Strains with Emphasis on Virulent Factors of Mobile Genetic Elements.

Xue M, Gao Q, Yan R, Liu L, Wang L, Wen B Microorganisms. 2023; 11(11).

PMID: 38004763 PMC: 10672994. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11112752.


References
1.
Nordstrom J, Rangdale R, Vickery M, Phillips A, Murray S, Wagley S . Evaluation of an alkaline phosphatase-labeled oligonucleotide probe for the detection and enumeration of the thermostable-related hemolysin (trh) gene of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Food Prot. 2006; 69(11):2770-2. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.11.2770. View

2.
Burdette D, Yarbrough M, Orth K . Not without cause: Vibrio parahaemolyticus induces acute autophagy and cell death. Autophagy. 2008; 5(1):100-2. PMC: 2788499. DOI: 10.4161/auto.5.1.7264. View

3.
Okada N, Iida T, Park K, Goto N, Yasunaga T, Hiyoshi H . Identification and characterization of a novel type III secretion system in trh-positive Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain TH3996 reveal genetic lineage and diversity of pathogenic machinery beyond the species level. Infect Immun. 2008; 77(2):904-13. PMC: 2632016. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01184-08. View

4.
Su Y, Liu C . Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a concern of seafood safety. Food Microbiol. 2007; 24(6):549-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2007.01.005. View

5.
Croci L, Suffredini E, Cozzi L, Toti L, Ottaviani D, Pruzzo C . Comparison of different biochemical and molecular methods for the identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Appl Microbiol. 2006; 102(1):229-37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03046.x. View