» Articles » PMID: 22526072

Measurement Error and Minimum Detectable Change in 4-meter Gait Speed in Older Adults

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2012 Apr 25
PMID 22526072
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Gait speed is a commonly-used assessment and outcomes measure in geriatric clinical and research settings. Although relative reliability of usual gait speed has been well studied in community- dwelling older adults, less emphasis has been placed on a measure of absolute reliability (the standard error of measurement [SEM]), and on an associated clinically relevant index of real change in gait speed, minimum detectable change (MDC). The purpose of this study was to quantify measurement error and MDC for usual gait speed over 4 meters in community-dwelling older adults ambulating at intermediate and fast speeds.

Methods: Community-dwelling older adults ambulating at intermediate gait speed (IGS), (n=15, mean age 74.2 yrs) and fast gait speed (FGS), (n=15, mean age 72.1) were included in this study. Participants performed two trials of gait speed over a distance of 4 meters. SEM and MDC at the 95% confidence level (MDC95) were computed for the IGS and FGS groups.

Results: Mean gait speed was 85.4 cm/s (IGS) and 129.9 cm/s (FGS). Measurement error (<5% of mean gait speed) and minimum detectable change (<13% of mean gait speed) were low in both groups. MDC95 was computed as 10.8 cm/s and 14.4 cm/s for the IGS and FGS groups, respectively.

Conclusions: To be considered real change beyond the bounds of measurement error, change in 4-meter gait speed should exceed 10.8 cm/s (for intermediate speed ambulators) or 14.4 cm/s (for fast speed ambulators). Low measurement error in assessing 4-meter gait speed in community-dwelling older adults suggests that gait speed assessed over short distances has excellent reproducibility across trials. Low minimum change values suggest that 4-meter gait speed may be responsive and sensitive to change.

Citing Articles

Impact of telephone coaching supporting a physical maintenance exercise programme for older adults at risk of falls: a randomised controlled trial.

Rince G, Volteau C, Fortin J, Couturier C, Rulleau T BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):879.

PMID: 39462354 PMC: 11515194. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05488-y.


Probabilistic Estimation of Cadence and Walking Speed From Floor Vibrations.

MejiaCruz Y, Caicedo J, Jiang Z, Franco J IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2024; 12:508-519.

PMID: 39050619 PMC: 11268939. DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2024.3415412.


A systematic review of the psychometric properties of physical performance tests for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults.

Exter S, Koenders N, Wees P, Berg M Age Ageing. 2024; 53(6).

PMID: 38851214 PMC: 11162262. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae113.


Test-retest reliability and agreement of remote home-based functional capacity self-administered assessments in community-dwelling, socially isolated older adults.

Villar R, Beltrame T, Ferreira Dos Santos G, Zago A, Bocalini D, Pontes Junior F Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241254904.

PMID: 38778868 PMC: 11110522. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241254904.


Clinical gait analysis using video-based pose estimation: Multiple perspectives, clinical populations, and measuring change.

Stenum J, Hsu M, Pantelyat A, Roemmich R PLOS Digit Health. 2024; 3(3):e0000467.

PMID: 38530801 PMC: 10965062. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000467.