» Articles » PMID: 22518184

Clinical Effectiveness of Peramivir in Comparison with Other Neuraminidase Inhibitors in Pediatric Influenza Patients

Overview
Journal Int J Pediatr
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2012 Apr 21
PMID 22518184
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The currently used antivirals in the treatment of influenza in Japan include amantadine, oseltamivir, zanamivir, laninamivir, and peramivir. We compared the efficacy of intravenous peramivir with that of other neuraminidase inhibitors for treating pediatric influenza. The present study included 223 influenza patients (≤18 years) who presented at the Hikita Pediatric Clinic between February and April 2011. We compared fever duration after starting treatment with antiviral drugs. Because inhalation drugs are difficult to use in <5-year-old patients and because of the potential adverse effects of oseltamivir in teenagers, we created two different age groups (<10-year-old group and 5-18-year-old group) to evaluate treatment results. In influenza A patients between 5 and 18 years old, the median fever duration after treatment with zanamivir was 2 days, compared with 1 day for peramivir (P = 0.0242). In influenza B patients between 5 and 18 years old, the median fever duration after treatment with laninamivir was 3 days, compared with 1 day for peramivir (P = 0.0097). We found no significant difference for any of the other combinations of drug/disease type/age groups. No adverse effects were observed with the antiviral drugs used. The results suggest that peramivir is very useful in pediatric influenza patients.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of Antiviral Treatment with Intravenous Peramivir and Oral Oseltamivir for Seasonal Influenza in Children.

Byun Y, Kim J, Paek S, Kim M, Park S, Song H Children (Basel). 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39857857 PMC: 11763945. DOI: 10.3390/children12010026.


Antiviral Drugs in Influenza.

Swierczynska M, Mirowska-Guzel D, Pindelska E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(5).

PMID: 35270708 PMC: 8910682. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19053018.


Improvement of respiratory symptoms and health-related quality of life with peramivir in influenza patients with chronic respiratory disease: Additional outcomes of a randomized, open-label study.

Kato M, Saisho Y, Tanaka H, Bando T Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2021; 15(5):651-660.

PMID: 33683019 PMC: 8404055. DOI: 10.1111/irv.12835.


A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Peramivir with Other Neuraminidase Inhibitors for Influenza Treatment.

Chen J, Wei S, Lai C, Weng T, Wang H Medicina (Kaunas). 2020; 56(2).

PMID: 32033501 PMC: 7073584. DOI: 10.3390/medicina56020063.


Outcomes and Adverse Effects With Peramivir for the Treatment of Influenza H1N1 in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.

Witcher R, Tracy J, Santos L, Chopra A J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 24(6):497-503.

PMID: 31719811 PMC: 6836703. DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-24.6.497.


References
1.
Sugaya N, Mitamura K, Yamazaki M, Tamura D, Ichikawa M, Kimura K . Lower clinical effectiveness of oseltamivir against influenza B contrasted with influenza A infection in children. Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 44(2):197-202. DOI: 10.1086/509925. View

2.
Smith S, Gums J . Antivirals for influenza: strategies for use in pediatrics. Paediatr Drugs. 2010; 12(5):285-99. DOI: 10.2165/11532530-000000000-00000. View

3.
Watanabe A, Chang S, Kim M, Chu D, Ohashi Y . Long-acting neuraminidase inhibitor laninamivir octanoate versus oseltamivir for treatment of influenza: A double-blind, randomized, noninferiority clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 51(10):1167-75. DOI: 10.1086/656802. View

4.
Kohno S, Kida H, Mizuguchi M, Shimada J . Efficacy and safety of intravenous peramivir for treatment of seasonal influenza virus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 54(11):4568-74. PMC: 2976170. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00474-10. View

5.
Kawai N, Ikematsu H, Iwaki N, Tanaka O, Yamanishi Y, Hirotsu N . Zanamivir treatment is equally effective for both influenza A and influenza B. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44(12):1666. DOI: 10.1086/518385. View