» Articles » PMID: 22516586

Differential Modulation of Cocaine's Discriminative Cue by Repeated and Variable Stress Exposure: Relation to Monoamine Transporter Levels

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Pharmacology
Date 2012 Apr 21
PMID 22516586
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Discriminative stimulus functions of drugs of abuse play an important role in the acquisition, maintenance and reinstatement of drug-taking behavior. The present study tested whether two different schedules of stressor presentation, i.e., repeated and variable, for 10 days, can modify the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in male rats trained to discriminate cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) from saline. Dopamine (DAT), serotonin (SERT) and norepinephrine (NET) transporter levels in mesocorticolimbic areas were also measured using western blotting after stress exposure to determine if the relative ratio of these proteins may explain differences in behavior. Rats exposed to both repeated and variable stress displayed shifts in the cocaine dose-response curve but with different patterns of responding. In handled controls, ED(50) values for cocaine-like responding were stable after 10 days of handling compared to baseline. Repeated stress produced a transient left-ward shift in cocaine-like responding, indicating increased sensitivity to the cocaine cue. ED(50) values after variable stress did not differ from baseline, although maximal cocaine-like responding was lower at the two highest doses of cocaine tested at which variably stressed rats exhibited more saline-like responding. Alterations in DAT and NET were found in the Repeated Stress group and DAT and SERT in the Variable Stress group in select brain regions which may be responsible for differences in behavior.

Citing Articles

Regulation of ethanol intake under chronic mild stress: roles of dopamine receptors and transporters.

Delis F, Rombola C, Bellezza R, Rosko L, Grandy D, Volkow N Front Behav Neurosci. 2015; 9:118.

PMID: 26029066 PMC: 4428139. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00118.


Restraint stress attenuates nicotine's locomotor stimulant but not discriminative stimulus effects in rats.

Harris A, Mattson C, Shelley D, Lesage M Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2014; 124:92-100.

PMID: 24867077 PMC: 4150835. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2014.05.012.


Effect of age on methylphenidate-induced conditioned taste avoidance and related BDNF/TrkB signaling in the insular cortex of the rat.

Wetzell B, Muller M, Cobuzzi J, Hurwitz Z, DeCicco-Skinner K, Riley A Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014; 231(8):1493-501.

PMID: 24563186 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-014-3500-y.


Methylphenidate amplifies the potency and reinforcing effects of amphetamines by increasing dopamine transporter expression.

Calipari E, Ferris M, Salahpour A, Caron M, Jones S Nat Commun. 2013; 4:2720.

PMID: 24193139 PMC: 4017736. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3720.

References
1.
Chait L, Uhlenhuth E, Johanson C . The discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of phenylpropanolamine, mazindol and d-amphetamine in humans. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1986; 24(6):1665-72. DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(86)90503-4. View

2.
Ahmad A, Rasheed N, Banu N, Palit G . Alterations in monoamine levels and oxidative systems in frontal cortex, striatum, and hippocampus of the rat brain during chronic unpredictable stress. Stress. 2010; 13(4):355-64. DOI: 10.3109/10253891003667862. View

3.
Morilak D, Barrera G, Echevarria D, Garcia A, Hernandez A, Ma S . Role of brain norepinephrine in the behavioral response to stress. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2005; 29(8):1214-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.08.007. View

4.
Sarabdjitsingh R, Isenia S, Polman A, Mijalkovic J, Lachize S, Datson N . Disrupted corticosterone pulsatile patterns attenuate responsiveness to glucocorticoid signaling in rat brain. Endocrinology. 2010; 151(3):1177-86. DOI: 10.1210/en.2009-1119. View

5.
Li C, Kosten T, Sinha R . Sex differences in brain activation during stress imagery in abstinent cocaine users: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry. 2005; 57(5):487-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.11.048. View