Reliability and Usefulness of the Pressure Pain Threshold Measurement in Patients with Myofascial Pain

Overview

Journal Ann Rehabil Med

Specialty Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2012 Apr 17

PMID 22506152

Citations 81

Authors

Giburm Park

Chan Woo Kim

Si Bog Park

Mi Jung Kim

Seong Ho Jang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the usefulness of a pressure algometer to measure pressure pain threshold (PPT) for diagnosis of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) in the upper extremity and trunk muscles.

Method: A group of 221 desk workers complaining of upper body pain participated in this study. Five physiatrists made the diagnosis of MPS using physical examination and PPT measurements. PPT measurements were determined for several muscles in the back and upper extremities. Mean PPT data for gender, side, and dominant hand groups were analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity of Fischer's standard method were evaluated. PPT cut-off values for each muscle group were determined using an ROC curve.

Results: Cronbach's alpha for each muscle was very high. The PPT in men was higher than in females, and the PPT in the left side was higher than in the right side for all muscles tested (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in PPT for all muscles between dominant and non-dominant hand groups. Diagnosis of MPS based on Fischer's standard showed relatively high specificity and poor sensitivity.

Conclusion: The digital pressure algometer showed high reliability. PPT might be a useful parameter for assessing a treatment's effect, but not for use in diagnosis or even as a screening method.

Citing Articles

Absolute and relative reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) assessment in patients with nonspecific shoulder pain.

Pavlou K, Constantinou A, Savva C, Pamboris G, Kyriakou P, Ploutarchou G Shoulder Elbow. 2025; :17585732251319739.

PMID: 40026778 PMC: 11866336. DOI: 10.1177/17585732251319739.

Development and testing of a device to detect trigger points, and local twitch responses in dry needling intervention.

Sharma M, Chaudhary S, Sood H MethodsX. 2025; 14:103033.

PMID: 40026595 PMC: 11872452. DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103033.

Pain Pressure Threshold as a Non-Linear Marker of Neural Adaptation in Amputees: Evidence from the DEFINE Cohort.

Imamura M, Gianlorenco A, Lacerda G, Battistella L, Fregni F NeuroSci. 2025; 6(1).

PMID: 39982269 PMC: 11843867. DOI: 10.3390/neurosci6010017.

The Role of Maladaptive Plasticity in Modulating Pain Pressure Threshold Post-Spinal Cord Injury.

Imamura M, Filardi R, Lacerda G, Pacheco-Barrios K, Shinzato G, Battistella L Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(3).

PMID: 39942436 PMC: 11816816. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13030247.

Immediate Effect of Compression Contrast Therapy on Quadriceps Femoris Muscles' Regeneration in MMA Fighters.

Trybulski R, Roczniok R, Galeziok K, Matuszczyk F, Bichowska-Paweska M, Wilk M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685751 PMC: 11642141. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237292.

References

Ohara H, Nakagiri S, Itani T, Wake K, Aoyama H . Occupational health hazards resulting from elevated work rate situations. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1976; 5(2):173-82. View

BECHTOL C . Grip test; the use of a dynamometer with adjustable handle spacings. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954; 36-A(4):820-4; passim. View

Vatine J, Shapira S, Magora F, Adler D, Magora A . Electronic pressure algometry of deep pain in healthy volunteers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74(5):526-30. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90118-t. View

Chung S, Um B, Kim H . Evaluation of pressure pain threshold in head and neck muscles by electronic algometer: intrarater and interrater reliability. Cranio. 1992; 10(1):28-34. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.1992.11677888. View

Onishi N, Nomura H, Sakai K, Yamamoto T, Hirayama K, Itani T . Shoulder muscle tenderness and physical features of female industrial workers. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1976; 5(2):87-102. View

Buchanan H, Midgley J . Evaluation of pain threshold using a simple pressure algometer. Clin Rheumatol. 1987; 6(4):510-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02330587. View

Fischer A . Pressure threshold meter: its use for quantification of tender spots. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986; 67(11):836-8. View

Delaney G, McKee A . Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the pressure threshold meter in measurement of myofascial trigger point sensitivity. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 72(3):136-9. DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199306000-00005. View

Kinser A, Sands W, Stone M . Reliability and validity of a pressure algometer. J Strength Cond Res. 2009; 23(1):312-4. DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31818f051c. View

10.

Dagtekin O, Konig E, Gerbershagen H, Marcus H, Sabatowski R, Petzke F . [Measuring pressure pain thresholds. Comparison of an electromechanically controlled algometer with established methods]. Schmerz. 2007; 21(5):439-44. DOI: 10.1007/s00482-007-0544-5. View

11.

Fischer A . Pressure algometry over normal muscles. Standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold. Pain. 1987; 30(1):115-126. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90089-3. View

12.

Chesterton L, Sim J, Wright C, Foster N . Interrater reliability of algometry in measuring pressure pain thresholds in healthy humans, using multiple raters. Clin J Pain. 2007; 23(9):760-6. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318154b6ae. View

13.

Hogeweg J, Langereis M, Bernards A, Faber J, Helders P . Algometry. Measuring pain threshold, method and characteristics in healthy subjects. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1992; 24(2):99-103. View

14.

Chesterton L, Barlas P, Foster N, Baxter D, Wright C . Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in healthy humans. Pain. 2003; 101(3):259-266. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00330-5. View

15.

Reeves J, Jaeger B, Graff-Radford S . Reliability of the pressure algometer as a measure of myofascial trigger point sensitivity. Pain. 1986; 24(3):313-321. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90117-X. View