[Comparison on Efficacy and Safety Between Domestic Levosimendan Versus Dobutamine for Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure]

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of domestic levosimendan versus dobutamine for patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).

Methods: ADHF patients from 8 medical centers were recruited in this multicenter, blind, positive-controlled, randomized study and received 24 h intravenous levosimendan (n = 114) or dobutamine (n = 114) therapy. SWAN-GANZ catheter was performed in patients with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥ 15 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) and cardiac index (CI) ≤ 2.5 L·min(-1)×m(-2) (n = 39 each).

Results: Compared with baseline level, LVEF increased [(31.56 ± 9.69)% vs. (28.44 ± 7.08)%, P < 0.01] at 24 h in both groups. LVEF increase at 24 h was similar between two groups [(3.11 ± 6.90)% vs. (3.00 ± 6.63)%, P > 0.05]. The PCWP decrease at 24 h was significantly greater in levosimendan group than in dobutamine group [(-8.90 ± 7.14) mm Hg vs. (-5.64 ± 6.83) mm Hg, P = 0.04]. Decrease in NT-proBNP at 3 days was also more significant in levosimendan group than in dobutamine group [the percentage change compared to baseline: (-22.36 ± 38.98)% vs. (-8.56 ± 42.42)%, P < 0.01]. Dyspnea improvement at 24 h was more significant in levosimendan group than in dobutamine group. The incidences of adverse reactions and events were similar between two groups.

Conclusion: LVEF improvement is similar between dobutamine and domestic levosimendan while greater decreases in PCWP and NT-proBNP are achieved with domestic levosimendan in patients with ADHF.