» Articles » PMID: 22488204

A New Method for Measuring Meal Intake in Humans Via Automated Wrist Motion Tracking

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2012 Apr 11
PMID 22488204
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Measuring the energy intake (kcal) of a person in day-to-day life is difficult. The best laboratory tool achieves 95 % accuracy on average, while tools used in daily living typically achieve 60-80 % accuracy. This paper describes a new method for measuring intake via automated tracking of wrist motion. Our method uses a watch-like device with a micro-electro-mechanical gyroscope to detect and record when an individual has taken a bite of food. Two tests of the accuracy of our device in counting bites found that our method has 94 % sensitivity in a controlled meal setting and 86 % sensitivity in an uncontrolled meal setting, with one false positive per every 5 bites in both settings. Preliminary data from daily living indicates that bites measured by the device are positively related to caloric intake illustrating the potential of the device to monitor energy intake. Future research should seek to further explore the relationship between bites taken and kilocalories consumed to validate the device as an automated measure of energy intake.

Citing Articles

Classifying Food Items During an Eating Occasion: A Machine Learning Approach with Slope Dynamics for Windowed Kinetic Data.

Baldi I, Lanera C, Bhuyan M, Berchialla P, Vedovelli L, Gregori D Foods. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39856942 PMC: 11764823. DOI: 10.3390/foods14020276.


The Fully Understanding Eating and Lifestyle Behaviors (FUEL) trial: Protocol for a cohort study harnessing digital health tools to phenotype dietary non-adherence behaviors during lifestyle intervention.

Goldstein S, Mwenda K, Hoover A, Shenkle O, Jones R, Thomas J Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241271783.

PMID: 39175923 PMC: 11339753. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241271783.


Exploring the Impact of the Class on In-the-Wild Human Activity Recognition.

Cherian J, Ray S, Taele P, Koh J, Hammond T Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(12).

PMID: 38931682 PMC: 11207638. DOI: 10.3390/s24123898.


sEMG-based automatic characterization of swallowed materials.

Hassan E, Khalifa Y, Morsy A Biomed Eng Online. 2024; 23(1):48.

PMID: 38760808 PMC: 11100060. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01241-z.


An explanation for the accuracy of sensor-based measures of energy intake: Amount of food consumed matters more than dietary composition.

Chou T, Hoover A, Goldstein S, Greco-Henderson D, Martin C, Raynor H Appetite. 2023; 194:107176.

PMID: 38154576 PMC: 10895650. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.107176.


References
1.
Beasley J, Riley W, Jean-Mary J . Accuracy of a PDA-based dietary assessment program. Nutrition. 2005; 21(6):672-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2004.11.006. View

2.
Flegal K, Carroll M, Ogden C, Curtin L . Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA. 2010; 303(3):235-41. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.2014. View

3.
Six B, Schap T, Zhu F, Mariappan A, Bosch M, Delp E . Evidence-based development of a mobile telephone food record. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110(1):74-9. PMC: 3042797. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.010. View

4.
Glanz K, Brug J, van Assema P . Are awareness of dietary fat intake and actual fat consumption associated?--a Dutch-American comparison. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997; 51(8):542-7. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600442. View

5.
Champagne C, Bray G, Kurtz A, Monteiro J, Tucker E, Volaufova J . Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002; 102(10):1428-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90316-0. View