» Articles » PMID: 2248508

Eight and 12 Week Courses of Cyclophosphamide in Nephrotic Syndrome

Overview
Journal Arch Dis Child
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 1990 Oct 1
PMID 2248508
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Seventy-three children with steroid dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome were randomly allocated to receive treatment with cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day) for either eight or 12 weeks, in combination with prednisolone. All patients had previously relapsed while the dosage was being reduced or within 14 days of discontinuing prednisolone in the six months before receiving cyclophosphamide treatment (steroid dependent), and had severe steroid toxicity. Thirty two patients were treated with cyclophosphamide for eight weeks, and 41 for 12 weeks. There were no differences between the two groups in age at onset of nephrosis or entry into the study, sex ratio, duration of nephrosis, number of relapses before entry, and follow up period after entry. The relapse free rate of patients treated for eight weeks (25%) was similar to that of those treated for 12 weeks (24%) five years after stopping the treatment, and the mean relapse free interval and the sparing effect of cyclophosphamide (if any) on subsequent treatment with steroids did not differ between the groups. We conclude that cyclophosphamide should be used for no longer than eight weeks at a dose of 2 mg/kg/day in children with steroid dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome.

Citing Articles

Non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children.

Larkins N, Hahn D, Liu I, Willis N, Craig J, Hodson E Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 11:CD002290.

PMID: 39513526 PMC: 11544715. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002290.pub6.


Oral cyclophosphamide therapy in 100 children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: experience from a developing country.

Sandhu J, Bhat D, Dhooria G, Pooni P, Bhargava S, Kakkar S Pediatr Nephrol. 2021; 36(9):2759-2767.

PMID: 33786660 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-021-05052-5.


CD80 Insights as Therapeutic Target in the Current and Future Treatment Options of Frequent-Relapse Minimal Change Disease.

Teh Y, Lim S, Jusoh N, Osman K, Mualif S Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021:6671552.

PMID: 33506028 PMC: 7806396. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6671552.


Non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children.

Larkins N, Liu I, Willis N, Craig J, Hodson E Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 4:CD002290.

PMID: 32297308 PMC: 7160055. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002290.pub5.


Positive effects of single-daily high-dose mizoribine therapy after cyclophosphamide in young children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.

Mizutani A, Fujinaga S, Sakuraya K, Hirano D, Shimizu T Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018; 23(2):244-250.

PMID: 30121800 DOI: 10.1007/s10157-018-1628-5.


References
1.
Garin E, Pryor N, Fennell 3rd R, RICHARD G . Pattern of response to prednisone in idiopathic, minimal lesion nephrotic syndrome as a criterion in selecting patients for cyclophosphamide therapy. J Pediatr. 1978; 92(2):304-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80032-8. View

2.
Feehally J, Beattie T, Brenchley P, Coupes B, Houston I, Mallick N . Modulation of cellular immune function by cyclophosphamide in children with minimal-change nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 1984; 310(7):415-20. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198402163100702. View

3.
Ueda N, Chihara M, Kawaguchi S, Niinomi Y, Nonoda T, Matsumoto J . Intermittent versus long-term tapering prednisolone for initial therapy in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. J Pediatr. 1988; 112(1):122-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(88)80136-7. View

4.
McCrory W, Shibuya M, Lu W, Lewy J . Therapeutic and toxic effects observed with different dosage programs of cyclophosphamide in treatment of steroid-responsive but frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. J Pediatr. 1973; 82(4):614-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(73)80586-4. View

5.
Siegel N, Goldberg B, Krassner L, HAYSLETT J . Long-term follow-up of children with steroid-responsive nephrotic syndrome. J Pediatr. 1972; 81(2):251-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(72)80291-9. View