» Articles » PMID: 22481998

Floating-electrode Enhanced Constriction Dielectrophoresis for Biomolecular Trapping in Physiological Media of High Conductivity

Overview
Date 2012 Apr 7
PMID 22481998
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present an electrokinetic framework for designing insulator constriction-based dielectrophoresis devices with enhanced ability to trap nanoscale biomolecules in physiological media of high conductivity, through coupling short-range dielectrophoresis forces with long-range electrothermal flow. While a 500-fold constriction enables field focusing sufficient to trap nanoscale biomolecules by dielectrophoresis, the extent of this high-field region is enhanced through coupling the constriction to an electrically floating sensor electrode at the constriction floor. However, the enhanced localized fields due to the constriction and enhanced current within saline media of high conductivity (1 S/m) cause a rise in temperature due to Joule heating, resulting in a hotspot region midway within the channel depth at the constriction center, with temperatures of ∼8°-10°K above the ambient. While the resulting vortices from electrothermal flow are directed away from the hotspot region to oppose dielectrophoretic trapping, they also cause a downward and inward flow towards the electrode edges at the constriction floor. This assists biomolecular trapping at the sensor electrode through enabling long-range fluid sampling as well as through localized stirring by fluid circulation in its vicinity.

Citing Articles

Dielectrophoresis: An Approach to Increase Sensitivity, Reduce Response Time and to Suppress Nonspecific Binding in Biosensors?.

Henriksson A, Neubauer P, Birkholz M Biosensors (Basel). 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36290922 PMC: 9599301. DOI: 10.3390/bios12100784.


On-chip microfluidic buffer swap of biological samples in-line with downstream dielectrophoresis.

Huang X, Torres-Castro K, Varhue W, Rane A, Rasin A, Swami N Electrophoresis. 2022; 43(12):1275-1282.

PMID: 35286736 PMC: 9203925. DOI: 10.1002/elps.202100304.


Dielectrophoresis: Developments and applications from 2010 to 2020.

Sarno B, Heineck D, Heller M, Ibsen S Electrophoresis. 2020; 42(5):539-564.

PMID: 33191521 PMC: 7986072. DOI: 10.1002/elps.202000156.


Refinement of insulator-based dielectrophoresis.

Crowther C, Hayes M Analyst. 2017; 142(9):1608-1618.

PMID: 28394391 PMC: 5507384. DOI: 10.1039/c6an02509a.


Review: Microbial analysis in dielectrophoretic microfluidic systems.

Fernandez R, Rohani A, Farmehini V, Swami N Anal Chim Acta. 2017; 966:11-33.

PMID: 28372723 PMC: 5424535. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.02.024.


References
1.
Chou C, Zenhausern F . Electrodeless dielectrophoresis for micro total analysis systems. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2004; 22(6):62-7. DOI: 10.1109/memb.2003.1266048. View

2.
Salieb-Beugelaar G, Simone G, Arora A, Philippi A, Manz A . Latest developments in microfluidic cell biology and analysis systems. Anal Chem. 2010; 82(12):4848-64. DOI: 10.1021/ac1009707. View

3.
Ying L, White S, Bruckbauer A, Meadows L, Korchev Y, Klenerman D . Frequency and voltage dependence of the dielectrophoretic trapping of short lengths of DNA and dCTP in a nanopipette. Biophys J. 2004; 86(2):1018-27. PMC: 1303895. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74177-6. View

4.
Gallo-Villanueva R, Rodriguez-Lopez C, Diaz-de-la-Garza R, Reyes-Betanzo C, Lapizco-Encinas B . DNA manipulation by means of insulator-based dielectrophoresis employing direct current electric fields. Electrophoresis. 2009; 30(24):4195-205. DOI: 10.1002/elps.200900355. View

5.
Gao J, Sin M, Liu T, Gau V, Liao J, Wong P . Hybrid electrokinetic manipulation in high-conductivity media. Lab Chip. 2011; 11(10):1770-5. PMC: 4084846. DOI: 10.1039/c1lc20054b. View