» Articles » PMID: 22478345

Varieties of Scientific Explanation

Overview
Journal Behav Anal
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2012 Apr 6
PMID 22478345
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Scientific explanations often take one of two forms. The first is instantiation. According to this form, an event is said to be explained when it can be expressed as some particular value of a variable in a general proposition, equation, or law. One example of instantiation in psychology is Stevens' psychophysical law. Another is the matching law in the experimental analysis of behavior. A second form of explanation is a deduction from a covering law. According to this form, an event is said to be explained when its description follows as a valid logical deduction in an argument that has a covering law as one premise and a statement of antecedent conditions as another premise. Examples of covering law explanations in psychology are found in traditional neobehaviorism, which sought to develop laws of behavior so that observed behavioral events could be explained as deductions therefrom. Strictly speaking, neither form of explanation is consistent with behavior-analytic explanations derived from Skinner's radical behaviorism, which emphasize the pragmatic sources and contributions of the verbal behavior regarded as explanatory.

Citing Articles

Behaviorism and the stages of scientific activity.

Moore J Behav Anal. 2012; 33(1):47-63.

PMID: 22479126 PMC: 2867505. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392203.


Behavior analysis, mentalism, and the path to social justice.

Moore J Behav Anal. 2012; 26(2):181-93.

PMID: 22478401 PMC: 2731454. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392075.


Bibliographic processes and products, and a bibliography of the published primary-source works of B. F. Skinner.

Morris E, Smith N Behav Anal. 2012; 26(1):41-67.

PMID: 22478394 PMC: 2731441. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392067.


Words are not things.

Moore J Anal Verbal Behav. 2012; 17:143-60.

PMID: 22477219 PMC: 2755460. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392961.

References
1.
Logue A, Rodriguez M, Pena-Correal T, Mauro B . Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experience-based differences. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984; 41(1):53-67. PMC: 1347956. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-53. View

2.
Baum W . On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974; 22(1):231-42. PMC: 1333261. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. View

3.
DAY W . Radical behaviorism in reconciliation with phenomenology. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969; 12(2):315-28. PMC: 1338563. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-315. View

4.
Skinner B . Are theories of learning necessary?. Psychol Rev. 1950; 57(4):193-216. DOI: 10.1037/h0054367. View

5.
STEVENS S . On the psychophysical law. Psychol Rev. 1957; 64(3):153-81. DOI: 10.1037/h0046162. View