» Articles » PMID: 22477352

Joint Control and the Selection of Stimuli from Their Description

Overview
Date 2012 Apr 6
PMID 22477352
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This research examined the role the two constituents of joint control, the tact and the echoic, play in producing accurate selections of novel stimuli in response to their spoken descriptions. Experiment 1 examined the role of tacts. In response to unfamiliar spoken descriptions, children learned to select from among six successively presented comparisons which varied in their color, shape, and border features. Repeated testing and training revealed that accurate selecting with new combinations of the same colors, shapes and borders, did not occur until after the children could themselves tact the individual color, shape and border features with the unfamiliar descriptions. Experiment 2 examined the role of self-echoics. Here, the stimulus features were given their familiar names, but the rehearsal of these names, while searching among the six successively presented comparisons, was impeded by a distracter task. Under these conditions selection of the correct comparison was found to depend on its position in the order of presentation. Correct comparisons presented earlier in the order, and presumably less effected by the distracter task, were more likely to be selected than correct comparisons presented later in the serial order. Taken together, these data suggest that generalized stimulus selection must be under joint tact/echoic control. The data also illustrate the distinction between mediated selection of a stimulus in response to its description (i.e., selection under joint control) and the traditional conception of an unmediated selection response evoked as a result of a heightened response probability in a conditional discrimination.

Citing Articles

Combinatorial Language parent-report Scores Differ Significantly Between Typically Developing Children and Those with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Arnold M, Netson R, Vyshedskiy A J Autism Dev Disord. 2022; 54(1):326-338.

PMID: 36315319 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-022-05769-8.


Emergent Intraverbal and Reverse Intraverbal Behavior Following Listener Training in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Almas I, Smith D, Eldevik S, Eikeseth S Anal Verbal Behav. 2022; 38(1):1-23.

PMID: 35719424 PMC: 9170847. DOI: 10.1007/s40616-021-00164-3.


The Effects of Competing Verbal Behavior on Performance in a Math Task.

Harman M, Kodak T, Bohl L, Mayland T Anal Verbal Behav. 2021; 37(1):57-76.

PMID: 34395166 PMC: 8295418. DOI: 10.1007/s40616-021-00145-6.


Imagination in Autism: A Chance to Improve Early Language Therapy.

Vyshedskiy A Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(1).

PMID: 33440627 PMC: 7826637. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9010063.


Novel Prefrontal Synthesis Intervention Improves Language in Children with Autism.

Vyshedskiy A, Khokhlovich E, Dunn R, Faisman A, Elgart J, Lokshina L Healthcare (Basel). 2020; 8(4).

PMID: 33339269 PMC: 7765988. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare8040566.


References
1.
Touchette P . The effects of graduated stimulus change on the acquisition of a simple discrimination in severely retarded boys. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968; 11(1):39-48. PMC: 1338441. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-39. View

2.
Lowenkron B . Instructional control of generalized relational matching to sample in children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989; 52(3):293-309. PMC: 1339182. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-293. View

3.
Lowenkron B, Colvin V . Generalized instructional control and the production of broadly applicable relational responding. Anal Verbal Behav. 2012; 12:13-29. PMC: 2748543. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392894. View

4.
Lowenkron B . Coding responses and the generalization of matching to sample in children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984; 42(1):1-18. PMC: 1348041. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-1. View

5.
Lowenkron B . Some logical functions of joint control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998; 69(3):327-54. PMC: 1284660. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-327. View