» Articles » PMID: 22467168

The Role of DNA Microarrays in the Evaluation of Fetal Death

Overview
Journal Prenat Diagn
Publisher Wiley
Date 2012 Apr 3
PMID 22467168
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fetal death occurs in 15% of clinically recognized pregnancies. Cytogenetic abnormalities are present in 50% of spontaneous abortions (fetal deaths < 20 weeks) whereas the rate is 6% to 13% for stillbirths (fetal deaths ≥ 20 weeks). Microarray has been demonstrated to increase the diagnosis of genetic abnormalities by providing coverage of the entire genome at a higher density, detecting as small as 50 to 100 kb deletions or duplications, known as copy number changes. Microarray is particularly suited for evaluation of fetal death because DNA can still be analyzed in macerated fetuses and nonviable tissue, two situations where culturing and karyotyping is known to have low yield. Microarray has already proven successful in providing additional genetic information beyond karyotype in spontaneous abortion. The few studies on the use of microarray in stillbirth evaluation have been promising, demonstrating an increase in the diagnosis of clinically relevant genetic abnormalities when compared with karyotype. As the cost and technology improve, microarray may ultimately become the first line screen for genetic abnormalities in stillbirth. The accurate diagnosis of a genetic abnormality as the cause for fetal death may provide closure for families, prevent unnecessary treatments, and enable clinicians to more accurately counsel and manage subsequent pregnancies.

Citing Articles

Embryoscopy and targeted embryo biopsy for the management of early abortion.

Rouleau J, Hernandez J, Costa M, Gordon T, Xanthopoulou L, Martin-Vasallo P J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; 42(2):655-664.

PMID: 39776389 PMC: 11871267. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03356-7.


What proportion of couples with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss and with a balanced rearrangement in one parent can potentially be identified through cell-free DNA genotyping?.

van Zutven L, Mijalkovic J, van Veghel-Plandsoen M, Goense M, Polak M, Knapen M Mol Cytogenet. 2023; 16(1):26.

PMID: 37775759 PMC: 10543837. DOI: 10.1186/s13039-023-00657-x.


Estimation on risk of spontaneous abortions by genomic disorders from a meta-analysis of microarray results on large case series of pregnancy losses.

Peng G, Zhou Q, Chai H, Wen J, Zhao H, Taylor H Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2023; 11(8):e2181.

PMID: 37013615 PMC: 10422064. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.2181.


Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Products of Conception in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss for specific anomalies detected by USG.

Gajjar K, Patel A, Patel B, Chettiar S, Jhala D Reprod Fertil. 2023; .

PMID: 36961397 PMC: 10160560. DOI: 10.1530/RAF-22-0092.


Chromosomal analysis of 262 miscarried conceptuses: a retrospective study.

Gui J, Ding J, Yin T, Liu Q, Xie Q, Ming L BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):906.

PMID: 36471261 PMC: 9721014. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05246-1.