Gender Differences in Personal and Work-related Determinants of Return-to-work Following Long-term Disability: a 5-year Cohort Study

Overview

Journal J Occup Rehabil

Publisher Springer

Specialties Occupational Medicine
Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2012 Apr 3

PMID 22466435

Citations 11

Authors

Valerie Lederer

Michele Rivard

Samia Djemaa Mechakra-Tahiri

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the differential effect of personal and work-related psychosocial, physical and organizational determinants by gender on time to return-to-work (RTW) following long-term disability.

Methods: Data come from a larger study conducted in the province of Quebec, Canada. A cohort of 455 adults on long-term disability due to work-related musculoskeletal disorders at the back/neck/upper limb was followed for 5 years through structured interviews and administrative databases. Left-truncated Cox regression modeling stratified by gender was used to assess time to a first partial or full RTW of at least 3 days.

Results: Survival curves of time to RTW were similar between men and women on long-term disability (log-rank test p value = 0.920) but many personal and occupational factors influencing RTW differed by gender. Women's risk factors included older age (HR = 0.734--in 10 years unit), poor to very poor perceived economic status (HR = 0.625), working ≥40 h/week and having dependents (HR = 0.508) and awareness of workplace-based occupational health and safety program (HR = 0.598); higher gross annual income (in $10,000 s) was a facilitator (HR = 1.225). In men, being over 55 years old (HR = 0.458), poor perceived economic status (HR = 0.653), working ≥40 h/week and high perceived physical workload (HR = 0.720) and higher job insecurity (HR = 0.825) negatively influenced time to RTW. For both men and women, probabilities of not returning to work varied widely according to workers' specific profile of personal and occupational factors (high or low risk profile).

Conclusion: Results confirm the importance of gender-sensitive strategies to investigate RTW determinants from a gender perspective.

Citing Articles

Evaluating Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Among Workers Admitted to a Posttraumatic Stress Injury Rehabilitation Program.

Krebs B, Brehon K, Miciak M, Dick B, Bremault-Phillips S, Straube S J Occup Rehabil. 2025; .

PMID: 40064793 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-025-10285-4.

Sickness absence after work accidents and post-traumatic stress among white-collar workers in the retail and wholesale industry; a longitudinal Swedish cohort study.

Farrants K, Alexanderson K BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2389.

PMID: 39227810 PMC: 11370135. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19865-0.

Prognostic Factors and Models for Predicting Work Absence in Adults with Musculoskeletal Conditions Consulting a Healthcare Practitioner: A Systematic Review.

Wynne-Jones G, Wainwright E, Goodson N, Jordan J, Legha A, Parchment M J Occup Rehabil. 2024; .

PMID: 38753046 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10205-y.

Exploring Work Absences and Return to Work During Social Transition and Following Gender-Affirming Care, a Mixed-Methods Approach: 'Bridging Support Actors Through Literacy'.

Van de Cauter J, Van de Velde D, Motmans J, Clays E, Braeckman L J Occup Rehabil. 2023; 34(2):425-446.

PMID: 37865621 PMC: 11180020. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-023-10139-x.

Sustainable Return to Work for Workers with Mental Health and Musculoskeletal Conditions.

Etuknwa A, Daniels K, Nayani R, Eib C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(2).

PMID: 36673814 PMC: 9859362. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021057.

References

de Rijk A, Nijhuis F, Alexanderson K . Gender differences in work modifications and changed job characteristics during the return-to-work process: a prospective cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009; 19(2):185-93. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-009-9168-1. View

Harrold L, Savageau J, Pransky G, Benjamin K . Understanding the role of sex differences in work injuries: implications for primary care practice. Disabil Rehabil. 2007; 30(1):36-43. DOI: 10.1080/09638280701192949. View

Crook J, Moldofsky H . The probability of recovery and return to work from work disability as a function of time. Qual Life Res. 1994; 3 Suppl 1:S97-109. DOI: 10.1007/BF00433383. View

Messing K, Punnett L, Bond M, Alexanderson K, Pyle J, Zahm S . Be the fairest of them all: challenges and recommendations for the treatment of gender in occupational health research. Am J Ind Med. 2003; 43(6):618-29. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10225. View

Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P, Esdaile J, Suissa S, Gosselin L . A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 22(24):2911-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00014. View

Silverstein B, Fan Z, Smith C, Bao S, Howard N, Spielholz P . Gender adjustment or stratification in discerning upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder risk?. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009; 35(2):113-26. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1309. View

Alexanderson K, Borg K, Hensing G . Sickness absence with low-back, shoulder, or neck diagnoses: an 11-year follow-up regarding gender differences in sickness absence and disability pension. Work. 2005; 25(2):115-24. View

Kaptein S, Gignac M, Badley E . Differences in the workforce experiences of women and men with arthritis disability: a population health perspective. Arthritis Rheum. 2009; 61(5):605-13. DOI: 10.1002/art.24427. View

Loisel P, Durand P, Abenhaim L, Gosselin L, SIMARD R, Turcotte J . Management of occupational back pain: the Sherbrooke model. Results of a pilot and feasibility study. Occup Environ Med. 1994; 51(9):597-602. PMC: 1128053. DOI: 10.1136/oem.51.9.597. View

10.

Gjesdal S, Bratberg E . The role of gender in long-term sickness absence and transition to permanent disability benefits. Results from a multiregister based, prospective study in Norway 1990-1995. Eur J Public Health. 2002; 12(3):180-6. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/12.3.180. View

11.

Leijon M, Hensing G, Alexanderson K . Sickness absence due to musculoskeletal diagnoses: association with occupational gender segregation. Scand J Public Health. 2004; 32(2):94-101. DOI: 10.1080/14034940310006195. View

12.

Gjesdal S, Bratberg E, Maeland J . Gender differences in disability after sickness absence with musculoskeletal disorders: five-year prospective study of 37,942 women and 26,307 men. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12:37. PMC: 3046931. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-37. View

13.

Messing K, Stellman J . Sex, gender and women's occupational health: the importance of considering mechanism. Environ Res. 2006; 101(2):149-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2005.03.015. View

14.

Coutu M, Durand M, Loisel P, Goulet C, Gauthier N . Level of distress among workers undergoing work rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007; 17(2):289-303. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-007-9079-y. View

15.

Krause N, Frank J, Dasinger L, Sullivan T, Sinclair S . Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med. 2001; 40(4):464-84. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.1116. View

16.

Hammarstrom A . A tool for developing gender research in medicine: examples from the medical literature on work life. Gend Med. 2007; 4 Suppl B:S123-32. DOI: 10.1016/s1550-8579(07)80053-2. View

17.

Fillingim R, King C, Ribeiro-Dasilva M, Rahim-Williams B, Riley 3rd J . Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J Pain. 2009; 10(5):447-85. PMC: 2677686. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.001. View

18.

Mantyselka P, Kumpusalo E, Ahonen R, Takala J . Direct and indirect costs of managing patients with musculoskeletal pain-challenge for health care. Eur J Pain. 2002; 6(2):141-8. DOI: 10.1053/eujp.2001.0311. View

19.

Brooks P . The burden of musculoskeletal disease--a global perspective. Clin Rheumatol. 2006; 25(6):778-81. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-006-0240-3. View

20.

de Vet H, Heymans M, Dunn K, Pope D, van der Beek A, Macfarlane G . Episodes of low back pain: a proposal for uniform definitions to be used in research. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(21):2409-16. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000030307.34002.BE. View