» Articles » PMID: 22447920

The Prognostic Value of Ki-67 Expression in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Overview
Journal J Clin Pathol
Specialty Pathology
Date 2012 Mar 27
PMID 22447920
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: To determine whether Ki-67 immunoexpression in penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) has a prognostic value and correlates with lymph node metastasis, human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and patient survival.

Methods: 148 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded PSCC samples were tissue-microarrayed, including 97 usual-type SCCs, 17 basaloid, 15 pure verrucous carcinomas, 2 warty and 17 mixed-type tumours. All samples were immunostained for Ki-67 protein. HPV DNA was detected with INNO-LiPA assay. Follow-up data were available for 134 patients.

Results: Ki-67 was strongly expressed in 57/148 (38.5%) of PSCCs. Different cancer subtypes showed significant difference in Ki-67 expression (p<0.0001) with highest positivity in basaloid, 16/17 (94%), followed by usual type, 38/97 (39%) and lack of Ki-67 positive cases within verrucous tumours, 0/15. Ki-67 positively correlated with high-risk HPV (p<0.0001) and showed good specificity (84%) but low sensitivity (61%) for high-risk HPV detection. Ki-67 protein strongly positively correlated with tumour grade (p<0.0001) but not with stage (p=0.2193), or lymph node status (p=0.7366). Ki-67 showed no prognostic value for cancer-specific survival (HR=1.00, 95%, CI 0.99 to 1.02, p=0.54) or overall survival (HR=1.00, 95%, CI 0.99 to 1.02, p=0.45). High tumour stage, lymph node metastasis, high tumour grade and age at diagnosis were all independent prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival and overall survival.

Conclusions: Ki-67 is only a moderate surrogate marker for HPV infection in PSCC. It does not show prognostic value for cancer-specific survival and overall survival in PSCC.

Citing Articles

Prognostic Markers and Trials in Penile Cancer.

Naushad N, Deb A, Agag A, Serag H, Sangar V Urol Res Pract. 2023; 49(3):138-146.

PMID: 37877863 PMC: 10346112. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2023.22225.


Predictive histopathological factors of nodal metastasis in penile cancer.

Garcia Campos M, Teixeira Junior A, Calixto J, Larges J, Pinho J, Silva G Int Braz J Urol. 2023; 49(5):628-636.

PMID: 37351908 PMC: 10482464. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0640.


A comprehensive analysis of penile cancer in the region with the highest worldwide incidence reveals new insights into the disease.

Teixeira Junior A, Melo S, Pinho J, Sobrinho T, Rocha T, Duarte D BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1):1063.

PMID: 36243680 PMC: 9569053. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10127-z.


What Is New in the Diagnosis and Management of Penile Cancer?.

Mahendra P, Ganesh B, Gagan P, Vidisha M Indian J Surg Oncol. 2022; 8(3):379-384.

PMID: 36118381 PMC: 9478079. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-016-0613-2.


A systematic review of non-HPV prognostic biomarkers used in penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Bowie J, Singh S, OHanlon C, Shiatis V, Brunckhorst O, Muneer A Turk J Urol. 2022; 47(5):358-365.

PMID: 35118975 PMC: 9612776. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2021.21199.