» Articles » PMID: 22447450

Germline Ablation of SMUG1 DNA Glycosylase Causes Loss of 5-hydroxymethyluracil- and UNG-backup Uracil-excision Activities and Increases Cancer Predisposition of Ung-/-Msh2-/- Mice

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2012 Mar 27
PMID 22447450
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Deamination of cytosine (C), 5-methylcytosine (mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (hmC) occurs spontaneously in mammalian DNA with several hundred deaminations occurring in each cell every day. The resulting potentially mutagenic mispairs of uracil (U), thymine (T) or 5-hydroxymethyluracil (hmU) with guanine (G) are substrates for repair by various DNA glycosylases. Here, we show that targeted inactivation of the mouse Smug1 DNA glycosylase gene is sufficient to ablate nearly all hmU-DNA excision activity as judged by assay of tissue extracts from knockout mice as well as by the resistance of their embryo fibroblasts to 5-hydroxymethyldeoxyuridine toxicity. Inactivation of Smug1 when combined with inactivation of the Ung uracil-DNA glycosylase gene leads to a loss of nearly all detectable uracil excision activity. Thus, SMUG1 is the dominant glycosylase responsible for hmU-excision in mice as well as the major UNG-backup for U-excision. Both Smug1-knockout and Smug1/Ung-double knockout mice breed normally and remain apparently healthy beyond 1 year of age. However, combined deficiency in SMUG1 and UNG exacerbates the cancer predisposition of Msh2(-/-) mice suggesting that when both base excision and mismatch repair pathways are defective, the mutagenic effects of spontaneous cytosine deamination are sufficient to increase cancer incidence but do not preclude mouse development.

Citing Articles

Small-molecule activator of SMUG1 enhances repair of pyrimidine lesions in DNA.

Gao Y, McPherson L, Adimoolam S, Suresh S, Wilson D, Das I DNA Repair (Amst). 2025; 146:103809.

PMID: 39879855 PMC: 11846699. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2025.103809.


Unprocessed genomic uracil as a source of DNA replication stress in cancer cells.

Saxena S, Nabel C, Seay T, Patel P, Kawale A, Crosby C Mol Cell. 2024; 84(11):2036-2052.e7.

PMID: 38688279 PMC: 11162326. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.04.004.


Base Excision Repair: Mechanisms and Impact in Biology, Disease, and Medicine.

Gohil D, Sarker A, Roy R Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(18).

PMID: 37762489 PMC: 10531636. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241814186.


DNA Glycosylases Define the Outcome of Endogenous Base Modifications.

Lirussi L, Nilsen H Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(12).

PMID: 37373453 PMC: 10299163. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241210307.


UV-DDB as a General Sensor of DNA Damage in Chromatin: Multifaceted Approaches to Assess Its Direct Role in Base Excision Repair.

Raja S, Van Houten B Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(12).

PMID: 37373320 PMC: 10298998. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241210168.


References
1.
Liu P, Burdzy A, Sowers L . Substrate recognition by a family of uracil-DNA glycosylases: UNG, MUG, and TDG. Chem Res Toxicol. 2002; 15(8):1001-9. DOI: 10.1021/tx020030a. View

2.
Darwanto A, Theruvathu J, Sowers J, Rogstad D, Pascal T, Goddard 3rd W . Mechanisms of base selection by human single-stranded selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284(23):15835-46. PMC: 2708880. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M807846200. View

3.
Elateri I, Tinkelenberg B, Hansbury M, Caradonna S, Muller-Weeks S, Ladner R . hSMUG1 can functionally compensate for Ung1 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst). 2003; 2(3):315-23. DOI: 10.1016/s1568-7864(02)00221-5. View

4.
Pettersen H, Sundheim O, Gilljam K, Slupphaug G, Krokan H, Kavli B . Uracil-DNA glycosylases SMUG1 and UNG2 coordinate the initial steps of base excision repair by distinct mechanisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35(12):3879-92. PMC: 1919486. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm372. View

5.
Krokan H, Drablos F, Slupphaug G . Uracil in DNA--occurrence, consequences and repair. Oncogene. 2002; 21(58):8935-48. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205996. View