» Articles » PMID: 22439666

A Phase II Study for Metabolic in Vivo Response Monitoring with Sequential 18FDG-PET-CT During Treatment with the EGFR-monoclonal-antibody Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: the Heidelberg REMOTUX Trial

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2012 Mar 24
PMID 22439666
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab has proven activity in metastatic colorectal cancer. To date, the mechanisms of action are not completely understood. Especially the impact on tumor glucose metabolism, or tumor vascularization remains largely unclear. The understanding of mechanisms such as early changes in tumor metabolism is of clinical importance since there may be a substantial influence on choice and sequence of drug combinations. Early signals of response to cetuximab may prove useful to identify patients having a relevant clinical treatment benefit. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the predictive relevance of the relative change in (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose tumor uptake for early clinical response during short-term single agent treatment with cetuximab. Early clinical response will be routinely measured according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. Accompanying research includes cytokine immune monitoring and analysis of tumor proteins and tumor genes.

Methods/design: The REMOTUX trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, single-arm, single-center early exploratory predictive study. The first (18)F-FDG PET-CT is conducted at baseline followed by the run-in phase with cetuximab at days 1 and 8. At day 14, the second (18)F-FDG PET-CT is performed. Subsequently, patients are treated according to the Folfiri-cetuximab regimen as an active and approved first-line regimen for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. At day 56, clinical response is evaluated with a CT-scan compared to the baseline analysis. Tracer uptake is assessed using standardized uptake values (SUVs). The main hypothesis to be tested in the primary analysis is whether or not the relative change in the SUV from baseline to day 14 has any predictive relevance for early clinical response determined at day 56. Patients are followed until death from any cause or until 24 months after the last patient has ended trial treatment.

Discussion: The aim of this trial is to evaluate metabolic changes in metastatic colorectal cancer during short-term single agent treatment with cetuximab and to analyse their potential of predicting early clinical response. This could be helpful to answer the question if early identification of patients not responding to cetuximab is possible.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT200811021020; EudraCT 200901327923.

Citing Articles

PET Imaging Biomarkers of Anti-EGFR Immunotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Models.

Lee T, Song I, Shin J, Park Y, Kim J, Kim K Cells. 2018; 7(11).

PMID: 30373221 PMC: 6262544. DOI: 10.3390/cells7110187.


Early metabolic response in sequential FDG-PET/CT under cetuximab is a predictive marker for clinical response in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer patients: results of the phase II REMOTUX trial.

Berger A, Lucke S, Abel U, Haag G, Grullich C, Stange A Br J Cancer. 2018; 119(2):170-175.

PMID: 29961759 PMC: 6048023. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0152-4.


Positron Emission Tomography for the Response Evaluation following Treatment with Chemotherapy in Patients Affected by Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Selected Review.

Zaniboni A, Savelli G, Pizzocaro C, Basile P, Massetti V Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015; 2015:706808.

PMID: 26078753 PMC: 4442279. DOI: 10.1155/2015/706808.

References
1.
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2008; 45(2):228-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. View

2.
Karapetis C, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker D, OCallaghan C, Tu D, Tebbutt N . K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(17):1757-65. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804385. View

3.
Lordick F, Ott K, Krause B, Weber W, Becker K, Stein H . PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007; 8(9):797-805. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70244-9. View

4.
Folprecht G, Grothey A, Alberts S, Raab H, Kohne C . Neoadjuvant treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases: correlation between tumour response and resection rates. Ann Oncol. 2005; 16(8):1311-9. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdi246. View

5.
Jonker D, OCallaghan C, Karapetis C, Zalcberg J, Tu D, Au H . Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(20):2040-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa071834. View