» Articles » PMID: 22438432

Prediction of Optimal Deployment Projection for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Angiographic 3-dimensional Reconstruction of the Aortic Root Versus Multidetector Computed Tomography

Overview
Date 2012 Mar 23
PMID 22438432
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Identifying the optimal fluoroscopic projection of the aortic valve is important for successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Various imaging modalities, including multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), have been proposed for prediction of the optimal deployment projection. We evaluated a method that provides 3-dimensional angiographic reconstructions (3DA) of the aortic root for prediction of the optimal deployment angle and compared it with MDCT.

Methods And Results: Forty patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR at St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada, were evaluated. All underwent preimplant 3DA and 68% underwent preimplant MDCT. Three-dimensional angiographic reconstructions were generated from images of a C-arm rotational aortic root angiogram during breath-hold, rapid ventricular pacing, and injection of 32 mL contrast medium at 8 mL/s. Two independent operators prospectively predicted perpendicular valve projections. The implant angle was chosen at the discretion of the physician performing TAVR. The angles from 3DA, from MDCT, the implant angle, and the postdeployment perpendicular prosthesis view were compared. The shortest distance from the postdeployment perpendicular prosthesis projection to the regression line of predicted perpendicular projections was calculated. All but 1 patient had adequate image quality for reproducible angle predictions. There was a significant correlation between 3DA and MDCT for prediction of perpendicular valve projections (r=0.682, P<0.001). Deviation from the regression line of predicted angles to the postdeployment prosthesis view was 5.1±4.6° for 3DA and 7.9±4.9° for MDCT (P=0.01).

Conclusions: Three-dimensional angiographic reconstructions and MDCT are safe, practical, and accurate imaging modalities for identifying the optimal perpendicular valve deployment projection during TAVR.

Citing Articles

Saudi Heart Association/National Heart Center/Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society/Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons/Saudi Cardiac Imaging Group 2023 TAVI Guidelines.

Albacker T, Tash A, Alamri H, Alasnag M, AlKashkari W, AlMutairi F J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024; 36(2):184-231.

PMID: 39234557 PMC: 11373420. DOI: 10.37616/2212-5043.1379.


Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for preprocedural planning of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.

Bertsche D, Metze P, Luo E, Dahme T, Gonska B, Rottbauer W Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1132626.

PMID: 37424915 PMC: 10326314. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1132626.


En face view of the transcatheter heart valve from deep right-anterior-oblique cranial position for coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a case series.

Hirose S, Enta Y, Ishii K, Inoue A, Nakashima M, Nomura T Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2022; 6(2):ytac059.

PMID: 35233498 PMC: 8874809. DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac059.


Automatic Identification of Bioprostheses on X-ray Angiographic Sequences of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Procedures Using Deep Learning.

Busto L, Veiga C, Gonzalez-Novoa J, Loureiro-Ga M, Jimenez V, Baz J Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(2).

PMID: 35204425 PMC: 8870761. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020334.


Cusp Overlap Technique: Should It Become the Standard Implantation Technique for Self-expanding Valves?.

Sengupta A, Alexis S, Lee T, Zaid S, Krishnamoorthy P, Khera S Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021; 23(11):154.

PMID: 34599425 PMC: 8845572. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-021-01583-3.