» Articles » PMID: 22436562

Addiction, Adolescence, and the Integration of Control and Motivation

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2012 Mar 23
PMID 22436562
Citations 90
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The likelihood of initiating addictive behaviors is higher during adolescence than during any other developmental period. The differential developmental trajectories of brain regions involved in motivation and control processes may lead to adolescents' increased risk taking in general, which may be exacerbated by the neural consequences of drug use. Neuroimaging studies suggest that increased risk-taking behavior in adolescence is related to an imbalance between prefrontal cortical regions, associated with executive functions, and subcortical brain regions related to affect and motivation. Dual-process models of addictive behaviors are similarly concerned with difficulties in controlling abnormally strong motivational processes. We acknowledge concerns raised about dual-process models, but argue that they can be addressed by carefully considering levels of description: motivational processes and top-down biasing can be understood as intertwined, co-developing components of more versus less reflective states of processing. We illustrate this with a model that further emphasizes temporal dynamics. Finally, behavioral interventions for addiction are discussed. Insights in the development of control and motivation may help to better understand - and more efficiently intervene in - vulnerabilities involving control and motivation.

Citing Articles

Approach Bias Modification for reducing Co-Occurring Alcohol and cannabis use among treatment-seeking Adolescents: Protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Hahn A, Corcoran E, Danielson C Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025; 44:101435.

PMID: 39944963 PMC: 11814518. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101435.


Age Differences in the Associations Between Interpersonal Relationships and Short-Form Video Addiction Symptoms: A Network Analysis.

Lei H, Zhu C, Wang Y, Shao T, Lu F, Zhang C Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024; 17:4431-4445.

PMID: 39735858 PMC: 11682666. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S486149.


Alterations of gray matter asymmetry in internet gaming disorder.

Chen S, Yan J, Lock M, Wang T, Wang M, Wang L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28282.

PMID: 39550457 PMC: 11569135. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79659-7.


Pavlovian impatience: The anticipation of immediate rewards increases approach behaviour.

Burghoorn F, Scheres A, Monterosso J, Guo M, Luo S, Roelofs K Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024; 25(2):358-376.

PMID: 39467981 PMC: 11906527. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-024-01236-2.


Social threat avoidance depends on action-outcome predictability.

Sequestro M, Serfaty J, Grezes J, Mennella R Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):100.

PMID: 39462095 PMC: 11512816. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00152-y.


References
1.
Conrey F, Sherman J, Gawronski B, Hugenberg K, Groom C . Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: the quad model of implicit task performance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005; 89(4):469-87. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.469. View

2.
Somerville L, Hare T, Casey B . Frontostriatal maturation predicts cognitive control failure to appetitive cues in adolescents. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010; 23(9):2123-34. PMC: 3131482. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21572. View

3.
Hensley W . Probability, personality, age, and risk taking. J Psychol. 1977; 95(1st Half):139-45. DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1977.9915870. View

4.
Pessoa L . How do emotion and motivation direct executive control?. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009; 13(4):160-6. PMC: 2773442. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.006. View

5.
Field M, Eastwood B, Bradley B, Mogg K . Selective processing of cannabis cues in regular cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006; 85(1):75-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.03.018. View