» Articles » PMID: 22420275

Susceptibility of Ixodes Scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) to Metarhizium Brunneum F52 (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) Using Three Exposure Assays in the Laboratory

Overview
Journal J Econ Entomol
Specialty Biology
Date 2012 Mar 17
PMID 22420275
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An emulsifiable concentrate (EC) and granular (G) formulation of the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium brunneum strain F52 (formerly Metarhizium anisopliae strain F52) were tested against unfed adults and nymphs of Ixodes scapularis Say in the laboratory. Three exposure methods; dip, surface contact, and direct spray application, and three exposure time intervals (3, 30, and 300 min) were used to evaluate the EC formulation. Application rates ranged from 2.6 x 10(2) to 2.6 x 10(8) conidia/cm2. The surface treatment was used for granular formulation with concentrations ranging from 2.3 x 10(5) to 2.3 x 10(7) conidia/cm2 for same three exposure times. Both the EC and G formulations of this fungus were highly pathogenic against I. scapularis adults and nymphs. Logistic regression analysis found formulation, spore concentration, time of exposure, and observation period were significant or highly significant factors influencing tick mortality. For adult I. scapularis, the spray application with the EC formulation of M. brunneum F52 resulted in a lower LC50 (5.9 x 10(4) conidia/cm2) at 30 min than surface exposure to the EC (LC50 = 1.3 x 10(6) conidia/cm2) or G formulation (LC50 = 8.1 x 10(5) conidia/cm2). At higher concentrations, fungal activity was evident in adult I. scapularis held at 5 degrees C suggesting the fungus may provide control in the cooler fall season. While the observed pathogenicity of a fungus against ticks can be dependent upon the bioassay assessment, we found nymphs and adults of I. scapularis to be highly susceptible to M. brunneum F52, regardless of the exposure method used.

Citing Articles

Microsclerotial pellets of Metarhizium spp.: thermotolerance and bioefficacy against the cattle tick.

da Paixao F, Muniz E, Catao A, Santos T, Luz C, Marreto R Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023; 107(7-8):2263-2275.

PMID: 36929189 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-023-12467-7.


Integrative Alternative Tactics for Ixodid Control.

Showler A, Saelao P Insects. 2022; 13(3).

PMID: 35323601 PMC: 8948879. DOI: 10.3390/insects13030302.


A Review of Commercial - and -Based Biopesticides for the Biological Control of Ticks in the USA.

Sullivan C, Parker B, Skinner M Insects. 2022; 13(3).

PMID: 35323558 PMC: 8952794. DOI: 10.3390/insects13030260.


Entomopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria in a Veterinary Perspective.

Ebani V, Mancianti F Biology (Basel). 2021; 10(6).

PMID: 34071435 PMC: 8229426. DOI: 10.3390/biology10060479.


Evaluation of spray applications of Metarhizium anisopliae, Metarhizium brunneum and Beauveria bassiana against larval winter ticks, Dermacentor albipictus.

Sullivan C, Parker B, Davari A, Lee M, Kim J, Skinner M Exp Appl Acarol. 2020; 82(4):559-570.

PMID: 33185806 DOI: 10.1007/s10493-020-00547-6.