» Articles » PMID: 22411207

Stress Urinary Incontinence in Climacteric Women in a Northeastern Brazilian Municipality: a Household Survey

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2012 Mar 14
PMID 22411207
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction And Hypothesis: Low socioeconomic factors may influence the development of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Thus far, there is little research available on SUI in developing countries. We aimed to determine whether the prevalence of SUI in a northeastern Brazilian municipality was higher or lower than in the general female population.

Methods: Cross-sectional household cluster study of 1,180 climacteric women in the São Luís municipality (Maranhão state, Brazil) was conducted using a standardized questionnaire that was previously tested in a pilot study and administered by interviewers to obtain socioeconomic and cultural information, climacteric aspects, and life habits related to SUI.

Results: From this population, 15.34% (n = 181) had SUI; this prevalence did not change with age. More than half (57.92%) of the patients replied that they had not consulted a physician for their SUI. The presence of SUI was not associated with any socioeconomic or gynecological variables after multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: The prevalence of SUI in São Luís was similar to the rates observed in the general global female population. Socioeconomic and gynecological variables were not associated with SUI.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of pelvic floor physiotherapy intervention for stress urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women: systematic review.

Malinauskas A, Bressan E, de Melo A, Brasil C, Lordelo P, Torelli L Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022; 308(1):13-24.

PMID: 35831758 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06693-z.


Validation and cultural translation for Brazilian Portuguese version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20).

Fernandes Arouca M, Duarte T, Lott D, Magnani P, Nogueira A, Rosa-E-Silva J Int Urogynecol J. 2016; 27(7):1097-106.

PMID: 26782099 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2938-8.

References
1.
Li Y, Cai X, Glance L, Mukamel D . Gender differences in healthcare-seeking behavior for urinary incontinence and the impact of socioeconomic status: a study of the Medicare managed care population. Med Care. 2007; 45(11):1116-22. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31812da820. View

2.
Tsai Y, Liu C . Urinary incontinence among Taiwanese women: an outpatient study of prevalence, comorbidity, risk factors, and quality of life. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009; 41(4):795-803. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-009-9523-3. View

3.
Guarisi T, Pinto Neto A, Osis M, Pedro A, Paiva L, Faundes A . [Urinary incontinence among climateric Brazilian women: household survey]. Rev Saude Publica. 2001; 35(5):428-35. DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89102001000500004. View

4.
Liapis A, Bakas P, Liapi S, Sioutis D, Creatsas G . Epidemiology of female urinary incontinence in the Greek population: EURIG study. Int Urogynecol J. 2009; 21(2):217-22. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-1019-2. View

5.
Lee J, Dwyer P . Age-related trends in female stress urinary incontinence surgery in Australia - Medicare data for 1994-2009. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 50(6):543-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01217.x. View