» Articles » PMID: 22408717

Long-term Results of Choledochoduodenostomy in Benign Biliary Obstruction

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2012 Mar 13
PMID 22408717
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To determine the long-term results of choledochodudenostomy in patients with benign billiary obstruction.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted at Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences Srinagar Kashmir, India over a period of 10 years from January 1997 to December 2007. The total number of patients who underwent choledochoduodenostomy during this period was 270. On the basis of etiology of biliary tract obstruction, patients were divided into a calculus group, an oriental cholangiohepatitis group, a benign biliary stricture group and others. Patients were followed for a variable period of 13 mo to 15 years.

Results: Choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) with duo-denotomy was performend in four patients. CDD with removal of T- tube, CDD with left hepatic lobectomy and CDD with removal of intra biliary ruptured hydatid was performed in three patients each. In the remaining patients only CDD was performed. Immediate post operative complications were seen in 63 (23%) patients, while long-term complications were seen in 28 (11%) patients, which were statistically significant. Three patients died during hospitalization while four patients died in the late post-operative period.

Conclusion: Our conclusion is that CDD is safe and produces good long term results when a permanent biliary drainage procedure is required.

Citing Articles

A Comparative Study of Choledochoduodenostomy Versus Open Choledochotomy With T Tube Placement in a Hospital Lacking Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Hassan F, Gaurav K, Kumar K, Kumar K, A P, N V Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71438.

PMID: 39559628 PMC: 11571280. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71438.


Safety and efficacy of hepaticoduodenostomy for biliary reconstruction after extrahepatic mid-bile duct cancer surgery.

Lee O, Lee C, Yoon S, Jeong J, Kim H, Chung J Gland Surg. 2024; 13(8):1418-1427.

PMID: 39282036 PMC: 11398998. DOI: 10.21037/gs-24-155.


Laparoscopic choledochotomy and choledochoduodenostomy for the management of persistent common bile duct stones.

Harbhajan Singh T, Seang S, Roy S, Majid A SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2022; 10:2050313X221128093.

PMID: 36199808 PMC: 9527980. DOI: 10.1177/2050313X221128093.


Study of Recellularized Human Acellular Arterial Matrix Repairs Porcine Biliary Segmental Defects.

Liu W, Zhang S, Hu Z, Feng S, Li Z, Xiao S Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019; 16(6):653-665.

PMID: 31824827 PMC: 6879690. DOI: 10.1007/s13770-019-00212-z.


Biliary Bypass with Laparoscopic Choledochoduodenostomy.

Kays J, Koniaris L, Milgrom D, Nakeeb A J Gastrointest Surg. 2018; 22(5):928-933.

PMID: 29340917 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3663-z.


References
1.
DEGENSHEIN G . Choledochoduodenostomy: an 18 year study of 175 consecutive cases. Surgery. 1974; 76(2):319-24. View

2.
Lygidakis N . Choledochoduodenostomy in calculous biliary tract disease. Br J Surg. 1981; 68(11):762-5. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800681104. View

3.
de Almeida A, Cruz A, Aldeia F . Side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy in the management of choledocholithiasis and associated disease. Facts and fiction. Am J Surg. 1984; 147(2):253-9. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90101-6. View

4.
Stuart M, HOERR S . Late results of side to side choledochoduodenostomy and of transduodenal sphincterotomy for benign disorders. A twenty year comparative study. Am J Surg. 1972; 123(1):67-72. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(72)90313-3. View

5.
Madden J, Chun J, Kandalaft S, Parekh M . Choledochoduodenostomy: an unjustly maligned surgical procedure?. Am J Surg. 1970; 119(1):45-54. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(70)90010-3. View