» Articles » PMID: 2240838

Ozone Concentration and Pulmonary Response Relationships for 6.6-hour Exposures with Five Hours of Moderate Exercise to 0.08, 0.10, and 0.12 Ppm

Overview
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 1990 Nov 1
PMID 2240838
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The magnitudes of pulmonary responses we previously observed (1) following 6.6-h exposures to 0.12 ppm ozone (O3) suggested that responses would also occur with similar exposures at lower O3 concentrations. The objective of this study was to determine the extent of pulmonary function decrements, respiratory discomfort, and increased airway reactivity to methacholine induced by exposure to O3 below 0.12 ppm. Separate 6.6-h chamber exposures to 0.00, 0.08, 0.10, and 0.12 ppm O3 included six 50-min periods of moderate exercise (VE approximately equal to 39 L/min, HR approximately equal to 115 bpm, and VO2 approximately equal to 1.5 L/min). Each exercise period was followed by 10 min of rest. A 35-min lunch break was included midway through the exposure. Although not intended as an exact simulation, the overall duration, intensity, and metabolic requirements of the exercise performed were representative of a day of moderate to heavy work or play. Preexposure FEV1 averaged 4.39 L, and essentially no change (+0.03 L) occurred with exposure to 0.00 ppm O3. Significant decreases (p less than 0.01) of -0.31, -0.30, and -0.54 L were observed with exposures to 0.08, 0.10, and 0.12 ppm, respectively. The provocative dose of methacholine required to increase airway resistance by 100% (PD100) was 58 cumulative inhalation units (CIU) following exposure to 0.00 ppm and was significantly reduced (p less than 0.01) to 37 CIU at 0.08, 31 CIU at 0.10, and 26 CIU at 0.12 ppm O3; reductions in PD100 are considered indicative of increases in nonspecific airway responsiveness.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Paris air quality monitoring for the 2024 Olympics and Paralympics: focus on air pollutants and pollen.

Bougault V, Valorso R, Sarda-Esteve R, Baisnee D, Visez N, Oliver G Br J Sports Med. 2024; 58(17):973-982.

PMID: 39054048 PMC: 11420723. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108129.


The rationale behind updates to ambient ozone guidelines and standards.

Xue K, Zhang X Front Public Health. 2024; 11:1273826.

PMID: 38756739 PMC: 11097954. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1273826.


Analysis of the Interior Microclimate in Art Nouveau Heritage Buildings for the Protection of Exhibits and Human Health.

Ilies A, Caciora T, Marcu F, Berdenov Z, Ilies G, Safarov B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(24).

PMID: 36554480 PMC: 9779619. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416599.


The Acute Effects of Exercising in Air Pollution: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Hung A, Nelson H, Koehle M Sports Med. 2021; 52(1):139-164.

PMID: 34499337 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01544-4.


Ozone Exposure, Outdoor Physical Activity, and Incident Type 2 Diabetes in the SALSA Cohort of Older Mexican Americans.

Yu Y, Jerrett M, Paul K, Su J, Shih I, Wu J Environ Health Perspect. 2021; 129(9):97004.

PMID: 34494856 PMC: 8425281. DOI: 10.1289/EHP8620.