Anterior and Posterior Compartment 3D Endovaginal Ultrasound Anatomy Based on Direct Histologic Comparison

Overview

Journal Int Urogynecol J

Publisher Springer

Specialties Gynecology & Obstetrics
Urology

Date 2012 Mar 10

PMID 22402641

Citations 9

Authors

S Abbas Shobeiri

Dena White

Lieschen H Quiroz

Mikio A Nihira

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction And Hypothesis: We used direct histologic comparison to validate the use of 3D endovaginal ultrasound (EVUS) as a novel and emerging technology for evaluating the structures found in the anterior and posterior pelvic floor compartments.

Methods: A young nulliparous female pelvis specimen was dissected and histologic slides were prepared by making 8-Micron-thick sagittal cuts. The slides were stained with Mallory trichrome and arranged to form large sections encompassing each anterior and posterior sagittal plane. Healthy nulliparous women underwent 3D EVUS to obtain 3D cubes of the anterior and posterior compartments. Two investigators independently evaluated the anterior and posterior midsagittal structures. The investigators mutually viewed the images and calculated urethral and anal sphincter measurements.

Results: Thirty-one nulliparous women underwent 3D EVUS; 77% of the participants were Caucasian, with mean age 31.8 [standard deviation (SD) 5.8] and mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.5 (SD 7.9). The following mean (SD) measurements were obtained: urethral length 36 mm (± 5); striated urogenital sphincter area 0.6 cm(2) (± 0.16); longitudinal and circular smooth muscle area 1.1 cm(2) (± 0.4); urethral complex width 14 mm (± 2); urethral complex area 1.3 cm(2) (± 0.4); internal anal sphincter length 26 mm (± 4); internal anal sphincter thickness 3.2 mm (± 0.8); and rectovaginal septum length 31 mm (± 5). The agreement for visualization of structures was as follows: vesical trigone 96% (κ = 0.65), trigonal ring 94% (κ = 0.8), trigonal plate 84% (κ = 0.6); longitudinal and circular smooth muscle 100%; compressor urethra 97% (κ = 0.85); striated urogenital sphincter 97% (κ = 0.85); rectovaginal septum 100%; internal anal sphincter 100%; external anal sphincter subdivisions 100%.

Conclusions: Three-dimensional EVUS can be used to visualize structures of the anterior and posterior compartments in nullipara.

Citing Articles

Use of transrectal high-frequency ultrasound in assessment of middle compartment prolapse.

Xuan Y, Wang Y, Yue S, Zhang J, Yanfei Q, Xie J Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(1):609-614.

PMID: 38836926 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07515-0.

Imaging modalities for the detection of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defaecation syndrome.

van Gruting I, Stankiewicz A, Thakar R, Santoro G, IntHout J, Sultan A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 9:CD011482.

PMID: 34553773 PMC: 8459393. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011482.pub2.

Gynecological influencing factors on the rectovaginal septum's morphology.

Rodriguez-Abarca M, Hernandez-Grimaldo E, de la Fuente-Villarreal D, Jacobo-Baca G, Quiroga-Garza A, Pinales-Razo R Int Urogynecol J. 2020; 32(6):1427-1432.

PMID: 32577787 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04376-4.

Macroplastique for women with stress urinary incontinence secondary to intrinsic sphincter deficiency.

Carroll T, Christie A, Foreman M, Khatri G, Zimmern P Int Braz J Urol. 2019; 45(5):989-998.

PMID: 31626522 PMC: 6844350. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0070.

AIUM/IUGA practice parameter for the performance of Urogynecological ultrasound examinations : Developed in collaboration with the ACR, the AUGS, the AUA, and the SRU.

Int Urogynecol J. 2019; 30(9):1389-1400.

PMID: 31111173 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-03954-5.

References

Dain L, Auslander R, Rosen T, Segev Y, Goldschmidt E, Abramov Y . Urodynamic findings in women with pelvic organ prolapse and obstructive voiding symptoms. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010; 111(2):119-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.06.007. View

Olsen A, Smith V, Bergstrom J, Colling J, Clark A . Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89(4):501-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6. View

Umek W, Kearney R, Morgan D, Ashton-Miller J, DeLancey J . The axial location of structural regions in the urethra: a magnetic resonance study in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102(5 Pt 1):1039-45. PMC: 1226706. DOI: 10.1016/j.obstetgynecol.2003.04.001. View

Hsu Y, Lewicky-Gaupp C, DeLancey J . Posterior compartment anatomy as seen in magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional reconstruction from asymptomatic nulliparas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198(6):651.e1-7. PMC: 2876342. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.032. View

Dietz H . Can the rectovaginal septum be visualized by transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 37(3):348-52. DOI: 10.1002/uog.8896. View

Zhai L, Liu J, Li Y, Yuan W, He L . Denonvilliers' fascia in women and its relationship with the fascia propria of the rectum examined by successive slices of celloidin-embedded pelvic viscera. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52(9):1564-71. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a8f75c. View

Strohbehn K, Ellis J, Strohbehn J, DeLancey J . Magnetic resonance imaging of the levator ani with anatomic correlation. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 87(2):277-85. DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00410-6. View

Sultan A, Kamm M, Hudson C, Thomas J, Bartram C . Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(26):1905-11. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199312233292601. View

Santoro G, Wieczorek A, Dietz H, Mellgren A, Sultan A, Shobeiri S . State of the art: an integrated approach to pelvic floor ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 37(4):381-96. DOI: 10.1002/uog.8816. View

10.

Snooks S, Swash M . Abnormalities of the innervation of the urethral striated sphincter musculature in incontinence. Br J Urol. 1984; 56(4):401-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1984.tb05830.x. View

11.

Dietz H, Wilson P . Anatomical assessment of the bladder outlet and proximal urethra using ultrasound and videocystourethrography. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999; 9(6):365-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02199565. View

12.

Whiteside J, Barber M, Paraiso M, Hugney C, Walters M . Clinical evaluation of anterior vaginal wall support defects: interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191(1):100-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.053. View

13.

Bergman A, Ballard C, Platt L . Ultrasonic evaluation of urethrovesical junction in women with stress urinary incontinence. J Clin Ultrasound. 1988; 16(5):295-300. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.1870160503. View

14.

Shobeiri S, Nolan T, Echols K, Chesson R . Digital examination compared to trans-perineal ultrasound for the evaluation of anal sphincter repair. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002; 78(1):31-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00068-1. View

15.

Klutke C, Golomb J, Barbaric Z, Raz S . The anatomy of stress incontinence: magnetic resonance imaging of the female bladder neck and urethra. J Urol. 1990; 143(3):563-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40020-6. View

16.

Santoro G, Wieczorek A, Shobeiri S, Mueller E, Pilat J, Stankiewicz A . Interobserver and interdisciplinary reproducibility of 3D endovaginal ultrasound assessment of pelvic floor anatomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2010; 22(1):53-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1233-y. View

17.

Oelrich T . The striated urogenital sphincter muscle in the female. Anat Rec. 1983; 205(2):223-32. DOI: 10.1002/ar.1092050213. View

18.

Sultan A, Kamm M, Bartram C, Hudson C . Anal sphincter trauma during instrumental delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1993; 43(3):263-70. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7292(93)90514-w. View

19.

Huisman A . Aspects on the anatomy of the female urethra with special relation to urinary continence. Contrib Gynecol Obstet. 1983; 10:1-31. View

20.

Cundiff G, Fenner D . Evaluation and treatment of women with rectocele: focus on associated defecatory and sexual dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104(6):1403-21. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000147598.50638.15. View