» Articles » PMID: 22400107

A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with Emergency Department Opt-In and Opt-Out Rapid HIV Screening

Overview
Journal AIDS Res Treat
Publisher Wiley
Date 2012 Mar 9
PMID 22400107
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study objective. To compare patient satisfaction with emergency department (ED) opt-in and opt-out HIV screening. Methods. We conducted a survey in an urban ED that provided rapid HIV screening using opt-in (February 1, 2007-July 31, 2007) and opt-out (August 1, 2007-January 31, 2008) approaches. We surveyed a convenience sample of patients that completed screening in each phase. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with HIV screening. Results. There were 207 and 188 completed surveys during the opt-in and opt-out phases, respectively. The majority of patients were satisfied with both opt-in screening (95%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 92-98) and opt-out screening (94%, 95% CI = 89-97). Satisfaction ratings were similar between opt-in and opt-out phases even after adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and test result (adjusted odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI = 0.5-3.1). Conclusions. Emergency department patient satisfaction with opt-in and opt-out HIV screening is similarly high.

Citing Articles

Financing Benefits and Barriers to Routine HIV Screening in Clinical Settings in the United States: A Scoping Review.

Serag H, Clark I, Naig C, Lakey D, Tiruneh Y Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(1).

PMID: 36612775 PMC: 9819288. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010457.


Comparison of HIV Screening Strategies in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Haukoos J, Lyons M, Rothman R, White D, Hopkins E, Bucossi M JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(7):e2117763.

PMID: 34309668 PMC: 8314142. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17763.


Routine opt-out HIV screening: more evidence in support of alternative approaches?.

Haukoos J, Hopkins E, Bucossi M Sex Transm Dis. 2014; 41(6):403-6.

PMID: 24825339 PMC: 4084621. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000139.


Impact of a routine, opt-out HIV testing program on HIV testing and case detection in North Carolina sexually transmitted disease clinics.

Klein P, Messer L, Myers E, Weber D, Leone P, Miller W Sex Transm Dis. 2014; 41(6):395-402.

PMID: 24825338 PMC: 5056640. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000141.


Public attitudes towards opt-out testing for HIV in primary care: a qualitative study.

Glew S, Pollard A, Hughes L, Llewellyn C Br J Gen Pract. 2014; 64(619):e60-6.

PMID: 24567618 PMC: 3905420. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X677103.


References
1.
Haukoos J, Hopkins E, Byyny R . Patient acceptance of rapid HIV testing practices in an urban emergency department: assessment of the 2006 CDC recommendations for HIV screening in health care settings. Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 51(3):303-9, 309.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.10.028. View

2.
Bokhour B, Solomon J, Knapp H, Asch S, Gifford A . Barriers and facilitators to routine HIV testing in VA primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2009; 24(10):1109-14. PMC: 2762506. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1078-6. View

3.
Lyons M, Haukoos J, Merchant R, White D, Rothman R, Aldridge C . Nomenclature and definitions for emergency department human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing: report from the 2007 conference of the National Emergency Department HIV Testing Consortium. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 16(2):168-77. PMC: 3173973. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00300.x. View

4.
Brown J, Kuo I, Bellows J, Barry R, Bui P, Wohlgemuth J . Patient perceptions and acceptance of routine emergency department HIV testing. Public Health Rep. 2009; 123 Suppl 3:21-6. PMC: 2567016. DOI: 10.1177/00333549081230S304. View

5.
Ahmed A, Hanssens C, Kelly B . Protecting HIV-positive women's human rights: recommendations for the United States National HIV/AIDS Strategy. Reprod Health Matters. 2009; 17(34):127-34. DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(09)34464-X. View