» Articles » PMID: 22396812

Combined Circular External Fixation and Open Reduction Internal Fixation with Pro-syndesmotic Screws for Repair of a Diabetic Ankle Fracture

Overview
Date 2012 Mar 8
PMID 22396812
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The surgical management of ankle fractures among the diabetic population is associated with higher complication rates compared to the general population. Efforts toward development of better methods in prevention and treatment are continuously evolving for these injuries. The presence of peripheral neuropathy and the possible development of Charcot neuroarthropathy in this high risk patient population have stimulated much surgical interest to create more stable osseous constructs when open reduction of an ankle fracture/dislocation is required. The utilization of multiple syndesmotic screws (pro-syndesmotic screws) to further stabilize the ankle mortise has been reported by many foot and ankle surgeons. In addition, transarticular Steinmann pins have been described as an adjunct to traditional open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) of the ankle to better stabilize the talus, thus minimizing risk of further displacement, malunion, and Charcot neuroarthropathy. The authors present a unique technique of ORIF with pro-syndesmotic screws and the application of a multi-plane circular external fixator for management of a neglected diabetic ankle fracture that prevented further deformity while allowing a weight-bearing status. This techniqu may be utilized for the management of complex diabetic ankle fractures that are prone to future complications and possible limb loss.

Citing Articles

A systematic review of ankle fracture treatment modalities in diabetic patients.

Manchanda K, Nakonezny P, Sathy A, Sanders D, Starr A, Wukich D J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021; 16:7-15.

PMID: 33717936 PMC: 7920114. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.12.013.


Clinical benefit and improvement of activity level after reconstruction surgery of Charcot feet using external fixation: 24-months results of 292 feet.

Illgner U, Budny T, Frohne I, Osada N, Siewe J, Wetz H BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014; 15:392.

PMID: 25417055 PMC: 4289265. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-392.


Management of diabetic neuropathic foot and ankle malunions and nonunions.

Stapleton J Diabet Foot Ankle. 2012; 2.

PMID: 22396816 PMC: 3284265. DOI: 10.3402/dfa.v2i0.6287.

References
1.
van den Bekerom M, Lamme B, Hogervorst M, Bolhuis H . Which ankle fractures require syndesmotic stabilization?. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007; 46(6):456-63. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2007.08.009. View

2.
Sanders R, Haidukewych G, Milne T, Dennis J, Latta L . Minimal versus maximal plate fixation techniques of the ulna: the biomechanical effect of number of screws and plate length. J Orthop Trauma. 2002; 16(3):166-71. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200203000-00005. View

3.
Lindsjo U . Operative treatment of ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1981; 189:1-131. DOI: 10.3109/ort.1981.52.suppl-189.01. View

4.
Boden S, Labropoulos P, McCowin P, Lestini W, Hurwitz S . Mechanical considerations for the syndesmosis screw. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71(10):1548-55. View

5.
Koval K, Petraco D, Kummer F, Bharam S . A new technique for complex fibula fracture fixation in the elderly: a clinical and biomechanical evaluation. J Orthop Trauma. 1997; 11(1):28-33. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199701000-00007. View