» Articles » PMID: 22391497

"Black Bone" MRI: a Partial Flip Angle Technique for Radiation Reduction in Craniofacial Imaging

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2012 Mar 7
PMID 22391497
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The potential harmful effects of ionising radiation continue to be highlighted. Radiation reduction techniques have largely consisted of low-dose techniques rather than a shift to non-ionising methods of imaging. CT scanning is frequently employed for imaging the craniofacial skeleton despite being one of the key anatomical regions for radiation protection in view of the radiosensitive lens and thyroid gland. We describe a low flip angle gradient echo MRI sequence which provides high image contrast between bone and other tissues but reduces the contrast between individual soft tissues. This permits the "black bone" to be easily distinguished from the uniformity of the soft tissues. While maintaining a repetition time of 8.6 ms and an echo time of 4.2 ms, the flip angle which provided optimised suppression of both fat and water was identified to be 5°. The biometric accuracy of this sequence was confirmed using a phantom to obtain direct anatomical measurements and comparable CT scanning. The average discrepancy between black bone MRI measurements and direct anatomical measurements was 0.32 mm. Black bone MRI therefore has the potential to reduce radiation exposure by replacing CT scanning when imaging the facial skeleton, with particular scope for imaging benign conditions in the young.

Citing Articles

Can MRI be a potential substitute for CT in cephalometric analysis for radiation-free diagnoses?.

Rao N, Kaur N, Rana S, Gupta A, Vichare S, Rajagopalan A J Orofac Orthop. 2025; .

PMID: 40063106 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-025-00576-z.


Black Bone MRI vs. CT in temporal bone assessment in craniosynostosis: a radiation-free alternative.

Valeggia S, Dremmen M, Mathijssen I, Gaillard L, Manara R, Ceccato R Neuroradiology. 2024; 67(1):257-267.

PMID: 39704798 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-024-03525-6.


Craniofacial Imaging of Pediatric Patients by Ultrashort Echo-Time Bone-Selective MRI in Comparison to CT.

Kamona N, Ng J, Kim Y, D Vu B, Vossough A, Wagner C Acad Radiol. 2024; 31(11):4629-4642.

PMID: 39242296 PMC: 11525957. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.053.


Three contrasts in 3 min: Rapid, high-resolution, and bone-selective UTE MRI for craniofacial imaging with automated deep-learning skull segmentation.

Vu B, Kamona N, Kim Y, Ng J, Jones B, Wehrli F Magn Reson Med. 2024; 93(1):245-260.

PMID: 39219299 PMC: 11735049. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30275.


MR Cranial Bone Imaging: Evaluation of Both Motion-Corrected and Automated Deep Learning Pseudo-CT Estimated MR Images.

Linkugel A, Wang T, Boroojeni P, Eldeniz C, Chen Y, Skolnick G AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024; 45(9):1284-1290.

PMID: 38991771 PMC: 11392357. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8335.


References
1.
Waitzman A, Posnick J, Armstrong D, Pron G . Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: Part I. Accuracy and reproducibility. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992; 29(2):112-7. DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0112_csmboc_2.3.co_2. View

2.
Robson M, Bydder G . Clinical ultrashort echo time imaging of bone and other connective tissues. NMR Biomed. 2006; 19(7):765-80. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1100. View

3.
Golding S . Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT): the dose challenge of the new revolution. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005; 114(1-3):303-7. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch545. View

4.
Connor S, Arscott T, Berry J, Greene L, OGorman R . Precision and accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of skull landmarks. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007; 36(5):270-6. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/90016954. View

5.
Golding S . Radiation exposure in CT: what is the professionally responsible approach?. Radiology. 2010; 255(3):683-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100449. View