» Articles » PMID: 22389664

Prenatal Detection of Aneuploidy and Imbalanced Chromosomal Arrangements by Massively Parallel Sequencing

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Mar 6
PMID 22389664
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fetal chromosomal abnormalities are the most common reasons for invasive prenatal testing. Currently, G-band karyotyping and several molecular genetic methods have been established for diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Although these testing methods are highly reliable, the major limitation remains restricted resolutions or can only achieve limited coverage on the human genome at one time. The massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technologies which can reach single base pair resolution allows detection of genome-wide intragenic deletions and duplication challenging karyotyping and microarrays as the tool for prenatal diagnosis. Here we reported a novel and robust MPS-based method to detect aneuploidy and imbalanced chromosomal arrangements in amniotic fluid (AF) samples. We sequenced 62 AF samples on Illumina GAIIx platform and with averagely 0.01× whole genome sequencing data we detected 13 samples with numerical chromosomal abnormalities by z-test. With up to 2× whole genome sequencing data we were able to detect microdeletion/microduplication (ranged from 1.4 Mb to 37.3 Mb of 5 samples from chorionic villus sampling (CVS) using SeqSeq algorithm. Our work demonstrated MPS is a robust and accurate approach to detect aneuploidy and imbalanced chromosomal arrangements in prenatal samples.

Citing Articles

Molecular methods in cancer diagnostics: a short review.

Budhbaware T, Rathored J, Shende S Ann Med. 2024; 56(1):2353893.

PMID: 38753424 PMC: 11100444. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2353893.


Analysis of copy number variations and possible candidate genes in spontaneous abortion by copy number variation sequencing.

Bai W, Zhang Q, Lin Z, Ye J, Shen X, Zhou L Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1218793.

PMID: 37916154 PMC: 10616874. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1218793.


Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Mastromoro G, Guadagnolo D, Khaleghi Hashemian N, Marchionni E, Traversa A, Pizzuti A Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(3).

PMID: 35328129 PMC: 8947110. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030575.


Sub-Exome Target Sequencing in a Family With Syndactyly Type IV Due to a Novel Partial Duplication of the Gene: First Case Report in Fujian Province of China.

Shi L, Huang H, Jiang Q, Huang R, Fu W, Mao L Front Genet. 2020; 11:130.

PMID: 32184803 PMC: 7058806. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00130.


46,XX Testicular Disorders of Sex Development With Gene Mutation: First Case Report Identified Prenatally by Integrated Analyses in China.

Deng J, Zhang H, Li C, Huang H, Liu S, Yang H Front Genet. 2020; 10:1350.

PMID: 32153624 PMC: 7045042. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01350.


References
1.
Hook E . Rates of chromosome abnormalities at different maternal ages. Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 58(3):282-5. View

2.
Chiang D, Getz G, Jaffe D, OKelly M, Zhao X, Carter S . High-resolution mapping of copy-number alterations with massively parallel sequencing. Nat Methods. 2008; 6(1):99-103. PMC: 2630795. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1276. View

3.
. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 88, December 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110(6):1459-67. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000291570.63450.44. View

4.
Morris J, Wald N, Mutton D, Alberman E . Comparison of models of maternal age-specific risk for Down syndrome live births. Prenat Diagn. 2003; 23(3):252-8. DOI: 10.1002/pd.568. View

5.
Vermeesch J, Fiegler H, de Leeuw N, Szuhai K, Schoumans J, Ciccone R . Guidelines for molecular karyotyping in constitutional genetic diagnosis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007; 15(11):1105-14. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201896. View