Intratumoral Versus Intravenous Gene Therapy Using a Transcriptionally Targeted Viral Vector in an Orthotopic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Rat Model
Overview
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of intratumoral delivery of adenoviral vector carrying a bidirectional two-step transcriptional amplification (TSTA) system to amplify transcriptional strength of cancer-specific Survivin promoter in a hepatocellular carcinoma model.
Materials And Methods: MCA-RH7777 cells were implanted in rat liver, and tumor formation was confirmed with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). The adenoviral vector studied had Survivin promoter driving a therapeutic gene (tumor necrosis factor-α-related apoptosis-inducing ligand [TRAIL]) and a reporter gene (firefly luciferase [FL]; Ad-pSurvivin-TSTA-TRAIL-FL). Tumor-bearing rats were administered Ad-pSurvivin-TSTA-TRAIL-FL intravenously (n = 7) or intratumorally (n = 8). For control groups, adenovirus FL under cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter (Ad-pCMV-FL) was administered intravenously (n = 3) or intratumorally (n = 3). One day after delivery, bioluminescence imaging was performed to evaluate transduction. At 4 and 7 days after delivery, 18F-FDG-PET was performed to evaluate therapeutic efficacy.
Results: With intravenous delivery, Ad-pSurvivin-TSTA-TRAIL-FL showed no measurable liver tumor FL signal on day 1 after delivery, but showed better therapeutic efficacy than Ad-pCMV-FL on day 7 (PET tumor/liver ratio, 3.5 ± 0.58 vs 6.0 ± 0.71; P = .02). With intratumoral delivery, Ad-pSurvivin-TSTA-TRAIL-FL showed positive FL signal from all tumors and better therapeutic efficacy than Ad-pCMV-FL on day 7 (2.4 ± 0.50 vs 5.4 ± 0.78; P = .01). In addition, intratumoral delivery of Ad-pSurvivin-TSTA-TRAIL-FL demonstrated significant decrease in tumoral viability compared with intravenous delivery (2.4 ± 0.50 vs 3.5 ± 0.58; P = .03).
Conclusions: Intratumoral delivery of a transcriptionally targeted therapeutic vector for amplifying tumor-specific effect demonstrated better transduction efficiency and therapeutic efficacy for liver cancer than systemic delivery, and may lead to improved therapeutic outcome for future clinical practice.
Pseudotyped lentiviral vectors: Ready for translation into targeted cancer gene therapy?.
Deng L, Liang P, Cui H Genes Dis. 2023; 10(5):1937-1955.
PMID: 37492721 PMC: 10363566. DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2022.03.007.
Construction of VSVΔ51M oncolytic virus expressing human interleukin-12.
Abdulal R, Malki J, Ghazal E, Alsaieedi A, Almahboub S, Khan M Front Mol Biosci. 2023; 10:1190669.
PMID: 37255540 PMC: 10225647. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1190669.
Chan A, Cheah J, Lokanathan Y, Ng M, Law J Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(4).
PMID: 36835438 PMC: 9964266. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24044026.
Storey K, Jackson T Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(21).
PMID: 34771476 PMC: 8582495. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215314.
Establishment of rat liver cancer cell lines with different metastatic potential.
Song L, Zhang J, Zheng L, Feng X, Hou J, Zhang H Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):8329.
PMID: 32433581 PMC: 7239898. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65338-w.