» Articles » PMID: 22386538

Patient Decision Aids in Knee Replacement Surgery

Overview
Journal Knee
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2012 Mar 6
PMID 22386538
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Arthroplasty is an effective intervention for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis refractory to conservative therapy. However, recent data highlights regional variations in service provision unrelated to disease severity and a low, but not insignificant, rate of patient dissatisfaction. The variation in knee arthroplasty provision is in part also due to the clinical decision-making of orthopaedic surgeons. The management of osteoarthritis is an example of a preference-sensitive clinical pathway, and possible explanations for poor patient satisfaction include unrealistic expectations and poor perception of potential benefits and risks. In addition to the individual impact, this represents an inefficient use of resources by healthcare providers during a challenging economic period. Improved shared-decision making between patients and clinicians would potentially address these issues. Patient decision aids provide relevant personalized evidence-based information to facilitate the shared decision-making process. Orthopaedic surgeons are receptive to the use of patient decision aids to support shared decision-making, but there are a number of issues to overcome before they are routinely adopted. The number of decision aids and the literature supporting their effectiveness is growing rapidly. NHS Direct has launched online patient decision support for knee osteoarthritis. The use of patient decision aids in clinical practice is gathering pace and may soon become the ethical and legal standard. This article provides a narrative review of patient decision aids in the context of knee replacement surgery from a UK perspective.

Citing Articles

Exploration of adverse consequences of total knee arthroplasty by patients and knee specialists: a qualitative study.

Te Molder M, Vriezekolk J, Van Onsem S, Smolders J, Heesterbeek P, van den Ende C Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2023; 8(1):rkad111.

PMID: 38152392 PMC: 10751231. DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkad111.


Adaptation and Implementation of a Shared Decision-Making Tool From One Health Context to Another: Partnership Approach Using Mixed Methods.

Turnbull S, Walsh N, Moore A J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e42551.

PMID: 37405845 PMC: 10357316. DOI: 10.2196/42551.


Comparison of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Patient Decision Aid vs Educational Material on Decision Quality, Shared Decision-Making, Patient Experience, and Functional Outcomes in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jayakumar P, Moore M, Furlough K, Uhler L, Andrawis J, Koenig K JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(2):e2037107.

PMID: 33599773 PMC: 7893500. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37107.


Technological developments enable measuring and using patient-reported outcomes data in orthopaedic clinical practice.

Hamilton D, Giesinger J, Giesinger K World J Orthop. 2020; 11(12):584-594.

PMID: 33362994 PMC: 7745490. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i12.584.


Synovial fluid fingerprinting in end-stage knee osteoarthritis: a novel biomarker concept.

Jayadev C, Hulley P, Swales C, Snelling S, Collins G, Taylor P Bone Joint Res. 2020; 9(9):623-632.

PMID: 33101658 PMC: 7548522. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.99.BJR-2019-0192.R1.