» Articles » PMID: 22384097

3T3 Cell Lines Stably Expressing Pax6 or Pax6(5a)--a New Tool Used for Identification of Common and Isoform Specific Target Genes

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Mar 3
PMID 22384097
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pax6 and Pax6(5a) are two isoforms of the evolutionary conserved Pax6 gene often co-expressed in specific stochiometric relationship in the brain and the eye during development. The Pax6(5a) protein differs from Pax6 by having a 14 amino acid insert in the paired domain, causing the two proteins to have different DNA binding specificities. Difference in functions during development is proven by the fact that mutations in the 14 amino acid insertion for Pax6(5a) give a slightly different eye phenotype than the one described for Pax6. Whereas quite many Pax6 target genes have been published during the last years, few Pax6(5a) specific target genes have been reported on. However, target genes identified by Pax6 knockout studies can probably be Pax6(5a) targets as well, since this isoform also will be affected by the knockout. In order to identify new Pax6 target genes, and to try to distinguish between genes regulated by Pax6 and Pax6(5a), we generated FlpIn-3T3 cell lines stably expressing Pax6 or Pax6(5a). RNA was harvested from these cell lines and used in gene expression microarrays where we identified a number of genes differentially regulated by Pax6 and Pax6(5a). A majority of these were associated with the extracellular region. By qPCR we verified that Ncam1, Ngef, Sphk1, Dkk3 and Crtap are Pax6(5a) specific target genes, while Tgfbi, Vegfa, EphB2, Klk8 and Edn1 were confirmed as Pax6 specific target genes. Nbl1, Ngfb and seven genes encoding different glycosyl transferases appeared to be regulated by both. Direct binding to the promoters of Crtap, Ctgf, Edn1, Dkk3, Pdgfb and Ngef was verified by ChIP. Furthermore, a change in morphology of the stably transfected Pax6 and Pax6(5a) cells was observed, and the Pax6 expressing cells were shown to have increased proliferation and migration capacities.

Citing Articles

Congenital aniridia beyond black eyes: From phenotype and novel genetic mechanisms to innovative therapeutic approaches.

Daruich A, Duncan M, Robert M, Lagali N, Semina E, Aberdam D Prog Retin Eye Res. 2022; 95:101133.

PMID: 36280537 PMC: 11062406. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101133.


Autoregulation of Pax6 in neuronal cells is mediated by Pax6(5a), Pax6(ΔPD), SPARC, and p53.

Shukla S, Mishra R Mol Biol Rep. 2022; 49(4):3271-3279.

PMID: 35103896 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-022-07164-z.


Generation and utilization of a HEK-293T murine GM-CSF expressing cell line.

Robinson E, Covarrubias S, Zhou S, Carpenter S PLoS One. 2021; 16(4):e0249117.

PMID: 33836009 PMC: 8034741. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249117.


mRNA Processing: An Emerging Frontier in the Regulation of Pancreatic β Cell Function.

Moss N, Sussel L Front Genet. 2020; 11:983.

PMID: 33088281 PMC: 7490333. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00983.


Keratin 12 mRNA expression could serve as an early corneal marker for limbal explant cultures.

Shi L, Stachon T, Kasmann-Kellner B, Seitz B, Szentmary N, Latta L Cytotechnology. 2020; 72(2):239-245.

PMID: 32016711 PMC: 7192984. DOI: 10.1007/s10616-020-00373-z.


References
1.
Egea J, Nissen U, Dufour A, Sahin M, Greer P, Kullander K . Regulation of EphA 4 kinase activity is required for a subset of axon guidance decisions suggesting a key role for receptor clustering in Eph function. Neuron. 2005; 47(4):515-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.029. View

2.
Duncan M, Haynes 2nd J, Cvekl A, Piatigorsky J . Dual roles for Pax-6: a transcriptional repressor of lens fiber cell-specific beta-crystallin genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1998; 18(9):5579-86. PMC: 109142. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.18.9.5579. View

3.
Nagase T, Nakamura S, Harii K, Osumi N . Ectopically localized HNK-1 epitope perturbs migration of the midbrain neural crest cells in Pax6 mutant rat. Dev Growth Differ. 2001; 43(6):683-92. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-169x.2001.00611.x. View

4.
Alavi A, Axford J . Sweet and sour: the impact of sugars on disease. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008; 47(6):760-70. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken081. View

5.
Livak K, Schmittgen T . Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2002; 25(4):402-8. DOI: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. View