» Articles » PMID: 22382208

Rotterdam Computed Tomography Score As a Prognosticator in Head-injured Patients Undergoing Decompressive Craniectomy

Overview
Journal Neurosurgery
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2012 Mar 3
PMID 22382208
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Rotterdam computed tomography (CT) score was developed for prognostic purposes in traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Objective: To examine the prognostic discrimination and prediction of the Rotterdam CT score in the case of patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy (DC) for TBI.

Methods: The CT scans with the worst findings before DC were scored according to the Rotterdam CT classification. Mortality and Glasgow Outcome Scale score at the end of follow-up were used as outcome measures. Unfavorable and favorable outcomes were defined by a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 1 to 3 and 4 to 5, respectively. We used binary logistic and proportional odds regression for prognostic analyses.

Results: The relationship between the Rotterdam CT score and prognosis was quantified, and higher scores indicated worse patient outcomes. Univariate analysis showed that the Rotterdam CT score was significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio: 3.117, 95% confidence interval: 1.867-5.386; P < .001) and unfavorable outcomes (odds ratio: 2.612, 95% confidence interval: 1.733-3.939; P < .001). After adjustment for published outcome predictors of TBI in multivariate regression, the Rotterdam CT score remained an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes (odds ratio: 1.830, 95% confidence interval: 1.043-3.212; P = .035).

Conclusion: For head-injured patients undergoing DC, the Rotterdam CT score provides great prognostic discrimination and is an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes. We suggest that the Rotterdam CT score be included as a prognosticator in the overall assessment of clinical condition of TBI patients before DC.

Citing Articles

Impact of frailty in elderly patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy after traumatic brain injury.

Niedermeyer S, Leiber M, Stocklein S, Weig T, Terpolilli N Neurosurg Rev. 2025; 48(1):297.

PMID: 40082341 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03442-z.


Helsinki computed tomography score in predicting short- and long-term outcomes after primary decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury.

Huang Y, Lee T Neurosurg Rev. 2025; 48(1):258.

PMID: 39982498 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03410-7.


Introduction to the Korean Neurotrauma Data Bank System and Report on the Results of the Second Project.

Kim J, Eom K J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2024; 68(1):25-36.

PMID: 39662961 PMC: 11725463. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2024.0156.


Computed Tomography Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter-to-Eyeball Transverse Diameter Ratio as a Novel Noninvasive Parameter for Prognostication in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Sharma P, Natarajan P, Br G, Ramakrishnan K, Aram A, Subramonian S Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e68297.

PMID: 39350870 PMC: 11441347. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68297.


Association of initial assessment variables and mortality in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury.

Bergus K, Patterson K, Asti L, Bricker J, Beyene T, Schulz L World J Pediatr Surg. 2024; 7(2):e000718.

PMID: 38818384 PMC: 11138288. DOI: 10.1136/wjps-2023-000718.