» Articles » PMID: 22379436

Repair of Acute and Chronic Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures Using the EndoButton

Overview
Journal Hand (N Y)
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2012 Mar 2
PMID 22379436
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There are many ways to repair distal biceps tendon ruptures with no outcome studies demonstrating superiority of a specific technique. There are few studies reporting on the repair of acute and chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures using the EndoButton via an anterior single-incision approach. We report on 27 patients who underwent distal biceps tendon repair with an EndoButton. The average age was 50.1 years (range, 36-78). There were 17 acute repairs (within 4 weeks of injury), nine chronic repairs (greater than 4 weeks), and one revision of a previous acute repair. All chronic repairs were repaired without the need for graft augmentation. Patients were assessed postoperatively using the ASES elbow outcome instrument and isokinetic flexion and supination strength and endurance testing. Eight control subjects were also tested for comparison. At an average follow-up of 30.9 months, 26 of 27 patients returned to their previous employment and activity level. The average ASES elbow score was 98.2 (range, 81-100). Compared with the contralateral extremity, there was no loss of motion. Average flexion strength recovery was 101% and mean supination strength recovery was 99%. There was no significant difference in function or strength with repair of acute versus chronic ruptures. Using the EndoButton technique, acute and chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures can be repaired safely with excellent clinical results.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of utilizing double-incision technique with combination of cortical button and interference screw fixation for distal biceps rupture: A case series.

Fisher B, Chong A, Feltz K, Berglund H, Hurd J Shoulder Elbow. 2025; 17585732241312212.

PMID: 39866906 PMC: 11755422. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241312212.


Distal biceps tendon repair: outcome and complications with single incision anchor fixation.

Jaschke M, Rekawek K, Sokolowski S, Wawrzyniak H, Kolodziej L Int Orthop. 2024; 48(10):2699-2707.

PMID: 39177818 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06279-1.


Outcomes and complications after different surgical techniques for the treatment of chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis.

Synovec J, Traven S, Griffith A, Novikov D, Li X, Woolf S JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023; 2(3):323-331.

PMID: 37588857 PMC: 10426634. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.02.007.


Staged Achilles Allograft Reconstruction of Chronic Bilateral Simultaneous Tears of the Retracted Distal Biceps Tendon Using a Novel Fixation Technique.

Metikala S, Portnoff B, Herickhoff P Cureus. 2022; 14(5):e25172.

PMID: 35747037 PMC: 9206879. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25172.


Outcomes of chronic distal biceps reconstruction with tendon grafting: a matched comparison with primary repair.

Hendy B, Padegimas E, Harper T, Lazarus M, Abboud J, Namdari S JSES Int. 2021; 5(2):302-306.

PMID: 33681854 PMC: 7910717. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.023.


References
1.
King J, Bollier M . Repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures using the EndoButton. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008; 16(8):490-4. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200808000-00008. View

2.
Sotereanos D, Pierce T, Varitimidis S . A simplified method for repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000; 9(3):227-33. View

3.
Ranelle R . Use of the Endobutton in repair of the distal biceps brachii tendon. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2007; 20(3):235-6. PMC: 1906570. DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2007.11928294. View

4.
Spang J, Weinhold P, Karas S . A biomechanical comparison of EndoButton versus suture anchor repair of distal biceps tendon injuries. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006; 15(4):509-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.020. View

5.
Sanchez-Sotelo J, Morrey B, Adams R, ODriscoll S . Reconstruction of chronic ruptures of the distal biceps tendon with use of an achilles tendon allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(6):999-1005. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200206000-00015. View