» Articles » PMID: 22375736

Assistive Devices Utilisation in Activities of Everyday Life--a Proposed Framework of Understanding a User Perspective

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2012 Mar 2
PMID 22375736
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This theoretical article proposes a framework of understanding a user perspective of assistive devices utilisation in everyday life.

Method: Utilising the MPT model (Matching Person and Technology) and the ValMO model (Values and Meaning in Human Occupations), a framework of understanding is proposed.

Results: Main components are person, assistive device, and activity, connected by the person's expectations and experiences concerning the doability/doworthiness (possible to do/worth doing) of an activity, and the usability/useworthiness (possible to use/worth using) of an assistive device. Expectations may differ based on not only earlier experiences (habitus), but also situational and environmental variations, and result in differing experiences. In general, the purpose of an assistive device is to increase a person's repertoire of doable activities. For a person, this can be a function of the evaluation of possible gains, in terms of correlation between investments (in terms of time and energy), and the (expected) result of the activity.

Conclusions: The only person able to estimate the useworthiness/usability of a device and the doworthiness/doability of an activity is the user her/himself, assessing the degree at which a specific assistive device enhances the value of an activity, in turn affecting the habitus of the (presumptive) user. [Box: see text].

Citing Articles

Adolescents with congenital limb reduction deficiency: Perceptions of treatment during childhood and its meaning for their current and future situation.

Sjoberg L, Hermansson L, Lindner H, Fredriksson C Child Care Health Dev. 2022; 48(4):613-622.

PMID: 35043417 PMC: 9303890. DOI: 10.1111/cch.12967.


The Overlooked Outcome Measure for Spinal Cord Injury: Use of Assistive Devices.

Scivoletto G, Galli G, Torre M, Molinari M, Pazzaglia M Front Neurol. 2019; 10:272.

PMID: 30967836 PMC: 6438886. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00272.


Perceptions of Existing Wearable Robotic Devices for Upper Extremity and Suggestions for Their Development: Findings From Therapists and People With Stroke.

Elnady A, Mortenson W, Menon C JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018; 5(1):e12.

PMID: 29764799 PMC: 5974461. DOI: 10.2196/rehab.9535.


The influence of environment: Experiences of users of myoelectric arm prosthesis-a qualitative study.

Widehammar C, Pettersson I, Janeslatt G, Hermansson L Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017; 42(1):28-36.

PMID: 28470129 PMC: 5808811. DOI: 10.1177/0309364617704801.


Client perceptions of the mental health engagement network: a qualitative analysis of an electronic personal health record.

Forchuk C, Reiss J, ORegan T, Ethridge P, Donelle L, Rudnick A BMC Psychiatry. 2015; 15:250.

PMID: 26467210 PMC: 4606496. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-015-0614-7.