Identification of Gene-oriented Exon Orthology Between Human and Mouse

Overview

Journal BMC Genomics

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Genetics

Date 2012 Feb 29

PMID 22369432

Citations 4

Authors

Gloria C-L Fu

Wen-Chang Lin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Gene orthology has been well studied in the evolutionary area and is thought to be an important implication to functional genome annotations. As the accumulation of transcriptomic data, alternative splicing is taken into account in the assignments of gene orthologs and the orthology is suggested to be further considered at transcript level. Whether gene or transcript orthology, exons are the basic units that represent the whole gene structure; however, there is no any reported study on how to build exon level orthology in a whole genome scale. Therefore, it is essential to establish a gene-oriented exon orthology dataset.

Results: Using a customized pipeline, we first build exon orthologous relationships from assigned gene orthologs pairs in two well-annotated genomes: human and mouse. More than 92% of non-overlapping exons have at least one ortholog between human and mouse and only a small portion of them own more than one ortholog. The exons located in the coding region are more conserved in terms of finding their ortholog counterparts. Within the untranslated region, the 5' UTR seems to have more diversity than the 3' UTR according to exon orthology designations. Interestingly, most exons located in the coding region are also conserved in length but this conservation phenomenon dramatically drops down in untranslated regions. In addition, we allowed multiple assignments in exon orthologs and a subset of exons with possible fusion/split events were defined here after a thorough analysis procedure.

Conclusions: Identification of orthologs at the exon level is essential to provide a detailed way to interrogate gene orthology and splicing analysis. It could be used to extend the genome annotation as well. Besides examining the one-to-one orthologous relationship, we manage the one-to-multi exon pairs to represent complicated exon generation behavior. Our results can be further applied in many research fields studying intron-exon structure and alternative/constitutive exons in functional genomic areas.

Citing Articles

Detection of orthologous exons and isoforms using EGIO.

Ma J, Wu J, Zhu L Bioinformatics. 2022; 38(19):4474-4480.

PMID: 35946527 PMC: 9525004. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac548.

The Evolution of Hemocyanin Genes in Caenogastropoda: Gene Duplications and Intron Accumulation in Highly Diverse Gastropods.

Schafer G, Grebe L, Schinkel R, Lieb B J Mol Evol. 2021; 89(9-10):639-655.

PMID: 34757470 PMC: 8599328. DOI: 10.1007/s00239-021-10036-y.

Functional divergence and intron variability during evolution of angiosperm TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1) genes.

Gao J, Huang B, Wan Y, Chang J, Li J, Liao P Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):14830.

PMID: 29093470 PMC: 5666015. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13645-0.

RNA-Seq Differentiates Tumour and Host mRNA Expression Changes Induced by Treatment of Human Tumour Xenografts with the VEGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Cediranib.

Bradford J, Farren M, Powell S, Runswick S, Weston S, Brown H PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e66003.

PMID: 23840389 PMC: 3686868. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066003.

References

Zhang X, Chasin L . Comparison of multiple vertebrate genomes reveals the birth and evolution of human exons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(36):13427-32. PMC: 1569180. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0603042103. View

Letunic I, Copley R, Bork P . Common exon duplication in animals and its role in alternative splicing. Hum Mol Genet. 2002; 11(13):1561-7. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/11.13.1561. View

Coulombe-Huntington J, Majewski J . Characterization of intron loss events in mammals. Genome Res. 2006; 17(1):23-32. PMC: 1716263. DOI: 10.1101/gr.5703406. View

Ho M, Chen C, Lin W . Gene-oriented ortholog database: a functional comparison platform for orthologous loci. Database (Oxford). 2010; 2010:baq002. PMC: 2860896. DOI: 10.1093/database/baq002. View

Meyer I, Durbin R . Comparative ab initio prediction of gene structures using pair HMMs. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18(10):1309-18. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.10.1309. View

Kim N, Alekseyenko A, Roy M, Lee C . The ASAP II database: analysis and comparative genomics of alternative splicing in 15 animal species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 35(Database issue):D93-8. PMC: 1669709. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl884. View

Zhang Z, Zhou L, Wang P, Liu Y, Chen X, Hu L . Divergence of exonic splicing elements after gene duplication and the impact on gene structures. Genome Biol. 2009; 10(11):R120. PMC: 3091315. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-11-r120. View

Hubbard T, Aken B, Beal K, Ballester B, Caccamo M, Chen Y . Ensembl 2007. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 35(Database issue):D610-7. PMC: 1761443. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl996. View

Modrek B, Lee C . Alternative splicing in the human, mouse and rat genomes is associated with an increased frequency of exon creation and/or loss. Nat Genet. 2003; 34(2):177-80. DOI: 10.1038/ng1159. View

10.

Betts M, Guigo R, Agarwal P, Russell R . Exon structure conservation despite low sequence similarity: a relic of dramatic events in evolution?. EMBO J. 2001; 20(19):5354-60. PMC: 125659. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/20.19.5354. View

11.

Babushok D, Ostertag E, Kazazian Jr H . Current topics in genome evolution: molecular mechanisms of new gene formation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006; 64(5):542-54. PMC: 11138463. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-006-6453-4. View

12.

Bafna V, Huson D . The conserved exon method for gene finding. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol. 2000; 8:3-12. View

13.

Alekseyenko A, Kim N, Lee C . Global analysis of exon creation versus loss and the role of alternative splicing in 17 vertebrate genomes. RNA. 2007; 13(5):661-70. PMC: 1852814. DOI: 10.1261/rna.325107. View

14.

Pan Q, Shai O, Lee L, Frey B, Blencowe B . Deep surveying of alternative splicing complexity in the human transcriptome by high-throughput sequencing. Nat Genet. 2008; 40(12):1413-5. DOI: 10.1038/ng.259. View

15.

Tatusov R, Fedorova N, Jackson J, Jacobs A, Kiryutin B, Koonin E . The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003; 4:41. PMC: 222959. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-4-41. View

16.

Korf I, Flicek P, Duan D, Brent M . Integrating genomic homology into gene structure prediction. Bioinformatics. 2001; 17 Suppl 1:S140-8. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.suppl_1.s140. View

17.

Pruitt K, Tatusova T, Maglott D . NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 35(Database issue):D61-5. PMC: 1716718. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl842. View

18.

Koonin E . Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics. Annu Rev Genet. 2005; 39:309-38. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.114725. View

19.

Hiller M, Platzer M . Widespread and subtle: alternative splicing at short-distance tandem sites. Trends Genet. 2008; 24(5):246-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.03.003. View

20.

Peng T, Li Y . Tandem exon duplication tends to propagate rather than to create de novo alternative splicing. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009; 383(2):163-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.03.162. View