» Articles » PMID: 22367410

Dose-escalated Simultaneous Integrated-boost Treatment of Prostate Cancer Patients Via Helical Tomotherapy

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2012 Feb 28
PMID 22367410
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this work was to assess the feasibility of moderately hypofractionated simultaneous integrated-boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) with helical tomotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer regarding acute side effects and dose-volume histogram data (DVH data).

Methods: Acute side effects and DVH data were evaluated of the first 40 intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated with a definitive daily image-guided SIB-IMRT protocol via helical tomotherapy in our department. The planning target volume including the prostate and the base of the seminal vesicles with safety margins was treated with 70 Gy in 35 fractions. The boost volume containing the prostate and 3 mm safety margins (5 mm craniocaudal) was treated as SIB to a total dose of 76 Gy (2.17 Gy per fraction). Planning constraints for the anterior rectal wall were set in order not to exceed the dose of 76 Gy prescribed to the boost volume. Acute toxicity was evaluated prospectively using a modified CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) score.

Results: SIB-IMRT allowed good rectal sparing, although the full boost dose was permitted to the anterior rectal wall. Median rectum dose was 38 Gy in all patients and the median volumes receiving at least 65 Gy (V65), 70 Gy (V70), and 75 Gy (V75) were 13.5%, 9%, and 3%, respectively. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. Acute grade 3 toxicity was observed in 20% of patients involving nocturia only. Grade 2 acute intestinal and urological side effects occurred in 25% and 57.5%, respectively. No correlation was found between acute toxicity and the DVH data.

Conclusion: This institutional SIB-IMRT protocol using daily image guidance as a precondition for smaller safety margins allows dose escalation to the prostate without increasing acute toxicity.

Citing Articles

Dosimetric feasibility of moderately hypofractionated/dose escalated radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer with intensity-modulated proton beam therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-IMPT) and impact of hydrogel prostate-rectum....

Ahmad Khalil D, Jazmati D, Geismar D, Wulff J, Baumer C, Kramer P Radiat Oncol. 2022; 17(1):64.

PMID: 35365170 PMC: 8973648. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02025-2.


Definitive, intensity modulated tomotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost for prostate cancer patients - Long term data on toxicity and biochemical control.

Schiller K, Geier M, Duma M, Nieder C, Molls M, Combs S Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2019; 24(4):315-321.

PMID: 31193851 PMC: 6543185. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.05.004.


Intraoperative Period and Breast Cancer: Review.

Akan A, Simsek S J Breast Health. 2017; 10(4):190-196.

PMID: 28331670 PMC: 5351514. DOI: 10.5152/tjbh.2014.2117.


Design and implementation of a "cheese" phantom-based Tomotherapy TLD dose intercomparison.

Schiefer H, Buchauer K, Heinze S, Henke G, Plasswilm L Strahlenther Onkol. 2015; 191(11):855-61.

PMID: 26087907 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-015-0850-2.


Moderate hypofractionation and simultaneous integrated boost by helical tomotherapy in prostate cancer: monoinstitutional report of acute tolerability assessment with different toxicity scales.

Ferrera G, Mortellaro G, Mannino M, Caminiti G, Spera A, Figlia V Radiol Med. 2015; 120(12):1170-6.

PMID: 26002724 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-015-0555-8.


References
1.
Kotte A, Hofman P, Lagendijk J, van Vulpen M, van der Heide U . Intrafraction motion of the prostate during external-beam radiation therapy: analysis of 427 patients with implanted fiducial markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 69(2):419-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.029. View

2.
Guckenberger M, Ok S, Polat B, Sweeney R, Flentje M . Toxicity after intensity-modulated, image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2010; 186(10):535-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-010-2144-z. View

3.
Roach 3rd M, Hanks G, Thames Jr H, Schellhammer P, Shipley W, Sokol G . Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 65(4):965-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.029. View

4.
Peeters S, Heemsbergen W, Koper P, van Putten W, Slot A, Dielwart M . Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(13):1990-6. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2530. View

5.
Geinitz H, Thamm R, Keller M, Astner S, Heinrich C, Scholz C . Longitudinal study of intestinal symptoms and fecal continence in patients with conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 79(5):1373-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.033. View