» Articles » PMID: 22365654

Omalizumab and the Risk of Malignancy: Results from a Pooled Analysis

Overview
Date 2012 Feb 28
PMID 22365654
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Since initial registration, the omalizumab clinical trial database has expanded considerably, with a doubling of patients exposed in the clinical trial environment. Previous pooled data (2003) from phase I to III studies of omalizumab showed a numeric imbalance in malignancies arising in omalizumab recipients (0.5%) compared with control subjects (0.2%). The previous analysis was based on limited available data, warranting further investigation.

Objective: We sought to examine the incidence of malignancy using comprehensive pooled data from clinical trials of omalizumab-treated patients.

Methods: This pooled analysis included data from 67 phase I to IV clinical trials. The prespecified primary analysis assessed the incidence of primary malignancy in 32 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (RDBPC) trials.

Results: There were 11,459 unique patients in all clinical trials (7,789 received omalizumab). The primary analysis identified malignancies in 25 patients (RDBPC trials): 14 in 4,254 omalizumab-treated patients and 11 in 3,178 placebo-treated patients. Incidence rates per 1,000 patient-years of observation time for omalizumab- and placebo-treated patients were 4.14 (95% CI, 2.26-6.94) and 4.45 (95% CI, 2.22-7.94), respectively; the corresponding rate ratio was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.39-2.27). Primary malignancies were of varying histologic type and occurred in a number of different organ systems; no cluster of histologies was identified.

Conclusions: In this pooled analysis no association was observed between omalizumab treatment and risk of malignancy in RDBPC trials; the rate ratio was below unity. The data suggest that a causal relationship between omalizumab therapy and malignancy is unlikely.

Citing Articles

Dupilumab Effectiveness in Patients with Severe Allergic Asthma Non-Responsive to Omalizumab.

Bagnasco D, Bondi B, Brussino L, Nicola S, Cameli P, Tiotiu A J Pers Med. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39997320 PMC: 11856950. DOI: 10.3390/jpm15020043.


Comparative efficacy and safety of the treatment by Omalizumab for chronic idiopathic urticaria in the general population: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Xu L, Yu H, Xu S, Wang Y, Cao Y Skin Res Technol. 2024; 30(5):e13749.

PMID: 38776128 PMC: 11110924. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13749.


Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part I: Cancer Risk. A Narrative Review.

Mansilla-Polo M, Morgado-Carrasco D Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024; 14(6):1389-1442.

PMID: 38763966 PMC: 11169156. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-024-01166-4.


Safety of Biological Therapies for Severe Asthma: An Analysis of Suspected Adverse Reactions Reported in the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database.

Cutroneo P, Arzenton E, Furci F, Scapini F, Bulzomi M, Luxi N BioDrugs. 2024; 38(3):425-448.

PMID: 38489062 PMC: 11055782. DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00653-6.


Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in a Case of Chronic Urticaria following Omalizumab Therapy.

Zolezzi A, Gualano G, Licata M, Mosti S, Mencarini P, Papagni R Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(12).

PMID: 38136689 PMC: 10740684. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12121655.