» Articles » PMID: 22363877

Glycemic Profiles of Healthy Individuals with Low Fasting Plasma Glucose and HbA1c

Overview
Journal ISRN Endocrinol
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2012 Feb 25
PMID 22363877
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Scant data exists on glucose profile variability in healthy individuals. Twenty-nine healthy subjects without diabetes (86% male; mean age, 38 years) were measured by a CGM system and under real-life conditions. The median percentage of time spent on the blood glucose >7.8 mmol/L for 24 hrs was greater than 10% in both NFG and IFG groups. When subjects were divided into either NFG group (i.e., FPG levels of <5.6 mmol/L; n = 22) or IFG group (FPG levels of 5.6-6.9 mmol/L; n = 7), all CGM indicators investigated but GRADE scores, including glucose variability measures, monitoring excursions, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and 24-hour AUC, did not differ significantly between the two groups. GRADE score and its euglycemia% were significantly different between the two groups. Among various CGM indicators, GRADE score may be a sensitive indicator to discriminate glucose profiles between subjects with NFG and those with IFG.

Citing Articles

Early detection of type 2 diabetes risk: limitations of current diagnostic criteria.

Zhang J, Zhang Z, Zhang K, Ge X, Sun R, Zhai X Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1260623.

PMID: 38027114 PMC: 10665905. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1260623.


Time above range for predicting the development of type 2 diabetes.

Marco A, Pazos-Couselo M, Moreno-Fernandez J, Diez-Fernandez A, Alonso-Sampedro M, Fernandez-Merino C Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1005513.

PMID: 36568777 PMC: 9772988. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1005513.


Continuous glucose monitoring metrics for earlier identification of pre-diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gottfried S, Pontiggia L, Newberg A, Laynor G, Monti D BMJ Open. 2022; 12(8):e061756.

PMID: 36008066 PMC: 9422846. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061756.


Postprandial glycemic response in a non-diabetic adult population: the effect of nutrients is different between men and women.

Gonzalez-Rodriguez M, Pazos-Couselo M, Garcia-Lopez J, Rodriguez-Segade S, Rodriguez-Garcia J, Tunez-Bastida C Nutr Metab (Lond). 2019; 16:46.

PMID: 31346341 PMC: 6637571. DOI: 10.1186/s12986-019-0368-1.


Glucotypes reveal new patterns of glucose dysregulation.

Hall H, Perelman D, Breschi A, Limcaoco P, Kellogg R, McLaughlin T PLoS Biol. 2018; 16(7):e2005143.

PMID: 30040822 PMC: 6057684. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005143.


References
1.
Zhou J, Jia W, Yu M, Yu H, Bao Y, Ma X . [The reference values of glycemic parameters for continuous glucose monitoring and its clinical application]. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2007; 46(3):189-92. View

2.
. Is fasting glucose sufficient to define diabetes? Epidemiological data from 20 European studies. The DECODE-study group. European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative analysis of Diagnostic Criteria in Europe. Diabetologia. 1999; 42(6):647-54. DOI: 10.1007/s001250051211. View

3.
Hill N, Hindmarsh P, Stevens R, Stratton I, Levy J, Matthews D . A method for assessing quality of control from glucose profiles. Diabet Med. 2007; 24(7):753-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02119.x. View

4.
. Glucose tolerance and cardiovascular mortality: comparison of fasting and 2-hour diagnostic criteria. Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161(3):397-405. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.161.3.397. View

5.
Rodbard D . Interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring data: glycemic variability and quality of glycemic control. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009; 11 Suppl 1:S55-67. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2008.0132. View