» Articles » PMID: 22363442

A Symmetric Dual Feedback System Provides a Robust and Entrainable Oscillator

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Feb 25
PMID 22363442
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many organisms have evolved molecular clocks to anticipate daily changes in their environment. The molecular mechanisms by which the circadian clock network produces sustained cycles have extensively been studied and transcriptional-translational feedback loops are common structures to many organisms. Although a simple or single feedback loop is sufficient for sustained oscillations, circadian clocks implement multiple, complicated feedback loops. In general, different types of feedback loops are suggested to affect the robustness and entrainment of circadian rhythms. To reveal the mechanism by which such a complex feedback system evolves, we quantify the robustness and light entrainment of four competing models: the single, semi-dual, dual, and redundant feedback models. To extract the global properties of those models, all plausible kinetic parameter sets that generate circadian oscillations are searched to characterize their oscillatory features. To efficiently perform such analyses, we used the two-phase search (TPS) method as a fast and non-biased search method and quasi-multiparameter sensitivity (QMPS) as a fast and exact measure of robustness to uncertainty of all kinetic parameters.So far the redundant feedback model has been regarded as the most robust oscillator, but our extensive analysis corrects or overcomes this hypothesis. The dual feedback model, which is employed in biology, provides the most robust oscillator to multiple parameter perturbations within a cell and most readily entrains to a wide range of light-dark cycles. The kinetic symmetry between the dual loops and their coupling via a protein complex are found critically responsible for robust and entrainable oscillations. We first demonstrate how the dual feedback architecture with kinetic symmetry evolves out of many competing feedback systems.

Citing Articles

Analysis of the spiking dynamics of a diode laser with dual optical feedback.

Bannon J, Main E, Hill T, Aragoneses A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1391.

PMID: 39789207 PMC: 11718258. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85876-5.


Systematic analysis of negative and positive feedback loops for robustness and temperature compensation in circadian rhythms.

Chakravarty S, Hong C, Csikasz-Nagy A NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2023; 9(1):5.

PMID: 36774353 PMC: 9922291. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-023-00268-7.


Coupling protocol of interlocked feedback oscillators in circadian clocks.

Rashid M, Kurata H J R Soc Interface. 2020; 17(167):20200287.

PMID: 32486952 PMC: 7328379. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0287.


Robustness analysis of the detailed kinetic model of an ErbB signaling network by using dynamic sensitivity.

Masunaga H, Sugimoto Y, Magi S, Itasaki R, Okada-Hatakeyama M, Kurata H PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0178250.

PMID: 28542548 PMC: 5443533. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178250.


Analytical study of robustness of a negative feedback oscillator by multiparameter sensitivity.

Maeda K, Kurata H BMC Syst Biol. 2015; 8 Suppl 5:S1.

PMID: 25605374 PMC: 4305980. DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-8-S5-S1.

References
1.
Smolen P, Baxter D, Byrne J . Modeling circadian oscillations with interlocking positive and negative feedback loops. J Neurosci. 2001; 21(17):6644-56. PMC: 6763090. View

2.
Maeda K, Kurata H . Quasi-multiparameter sensitivity measure for robustness analysis of complex biochemical networks. J Theor Biol. 2010; 272(1):174-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.012. View

3.
Kurata H, Matoba N, Shimizu N . CADLIVE for constructing a large-scale biochemical network based on a simulation-directed notation and its application to yeast cell cycle. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(14):4071-84. PMC: 165976. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg461. View

4.
Shearman L, Sriram S, Weaver D, Maywood E, Chaves I, Zheng B . Interacting molecular loops in the mammalian circadian clock. Science. 2000; 288(5468):1013-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5468.1013. View

5.
Savageau M . Parameter sensitivity as a criterion for evaluating and comparing the performance of biochemical systems. Nature. 1971; 229(5286):542-4. DOI: 10.1038/229542a0. View